Loading…
Loading…
Wyoming · Nonprofit
Fort Phil Kearny Bozeman Trail Asso (Wyoming) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $13,800 in grants to it, the largest being Wyoming Humanities Council ($8,800). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Fort Phil Kearny Bozeman Trail Asso's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,675 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Grant income rose $5k → $9k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of Fort Phil Kearny Bozeman Trail Asso’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Fort Phil Kearny Bozeman Trail Asso leans on a few funders — its largest provides 64% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Fort Phil Kearny Bozeman Trail Asso is locally rooted: 64% of its grant income comes from Wyoming funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $82k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
94% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing