Missouri · Nonprofit
FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION
FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION (Missouri) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,721 to it, the largest being Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ($6,160). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Mercy Health Springfield Communitiesshared funders
- Navrat Family Charitable Foundationportfolio match
- Hills Bancorporation Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
93% of FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $6k → $24.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 71% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
71% of FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Missouri, across 1 state.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Mercy Health Springfield Communitiesshared fundersMO · backs 24 organizations that share your funders
- Navrat Family Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Hills Bancorporation Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lori & David Scott Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kinman-Oldfield Fam Fdn Trportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dr C C and Mabel L Criss Memorialportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- GenYOUTH Incorporatedportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- R & R Realty Group Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arizona Foundation for Educational Advancementportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Paul D Austin Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Chief Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dillingham Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
94% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
71%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION?
- FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION (Missouri) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,721 to it, the largest being Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ($6,160). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 71% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $8,721 in grants to FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION?
- Greater Kansas City Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $6,160 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like FORT OSAGE RESOURCES CHAMPION EDUCATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing