Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

FILM LAB

FILM LAB (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,700 to it, the largest being TIGER BARON FOUNDATION INC ($7,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2018
$250k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$16k
Net assets
$0
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%
01What it does

What Film Lab does

Mission

Every time we all make a film, we climb a logistical, emotional, and financial mountain. Filmlab was established to make this process easier, cheaper, & more accessible to our community. We do this through our qualifications as a fiscal sponsor, our gear rental discounts with sales and rental houses as a not-for-profit, and our in-house resources covering everything standard in the spectrum of a professional production company: crew, gear, an annual insurance policy, office space, a screening room, and guidance . Our relationships with crew, performers, agencies, post-houses, and rental houses empowers every project we incubate. We aim to encourage a rigorous creative process with a focus on story-telling that is risky and experimental, to actively contribute to the diversification of the current climate in the entertainment industry, to foster a less divided film community, to challenge and disrupt common notions of what's commercially viable. To unify the brilliant independently floa

As stated on its FY2018 Form 990.

Program

In 2018, we helped incubate over 30 low-budget short films, some of which have gone on to win awards at festivals, become Oscar nominee eligible, and premiere at The Whitney museum.

The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($53k) Expenses 100 ($30k) Net assets 100 ($754)2018 Revenue 470 ($250k) Expenses 975 ($293k) Net assets 0 ($0)
20172018
Revenue (470)Expenses (975)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $16k to $0 (−100%).

$16k
$0
20172018
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
’17
−$43k
’18
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2019: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $5k → $11k.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 33% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FILM LAB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FILM LAB leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

33% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FILM LAB.

48%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 49% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

71% of FILM LAB's grant income comes from New York funders.

NY
MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like FILM LAB

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FILM LAB: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FILM LAB?
FILM LAB (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,700 to it, the largest being TIGER BARON FOUNDATION INC ($7,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does FILM LAB have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $15,700 in grants to FILM LAB, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FILM LAB?
TIGER BARON FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $7,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FILM LAB find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Film Lab →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2018 (financials across 2017–2018), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing