Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS

ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS (Washington) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $107 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($107). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$7.0M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$107
Net assets
$2.5M
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Environmental Works does

Mission

Environmental Works functions as a comunity design and central resource center for the disadvantaged areas of our community and aids them in developing long-range community objectivies regarding planning, design, and the environment; aids in the definition of present problems in these areas of our community and investigation of possible solutions; develops and aids in the development and improvement of low-income housing and facilities for the delivery of community and human services; preserves and protects the natural environment for the benefit of the public and furthers the conservation, preservation, enhancement, and restoration of parks, parks' facilities, recreation areas, and open spaces in communities; and aids, supports, and assists by gifts, contributions or otherwise, other tax-exempt charitable organizations.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community design: ew designs and advocates for equitable, community-led environments. In 2024, ew advanced affordable housing, childcare, and supportive-housing projects throughout the region, including addis village (affordable family housing and childcare), parkview services accessibility projects for people with disabilities, and multiple pre-development and real-estate advisory engagements. Ew also supported nonprofit clients with site selection, test fits, planning studies, and design-build community space activations that strengthen local relationships and spur future projects.

    $5,367,479 spent$7,028,408 earned by the program
    97% of program spending
  2. Community education: in 2024, ew continued to share best practices in equitable design, community-led development, and affordable housing. Staff presented at housing washington, the seattle design festival, and multiple higher-ed programs, including the university of washington college of built environments. Ew led workshops on childcare facility design, community-centered housing, and social-equity-driven planning. Through these efforts, ew helped train hundreds of students, practitioners, and community leaders in culturally responsive and just design practices.

    $97,204 spent
    2% of program spending
  3. Pro bono design services: ew provided pro bono design and planning support to nonprofit partners across washington state. In 2024, ew supported projects including tiny home villages, accessibility upgrades for low-income senior households, the homeless remembrance project's permitting and site coordination, and community-led visioning efforts in south seattle neighborhoods facing environmental-justice impacts. Ew also provided early feasibility and test-fit studies to bipoc-led organizations pursuing culturally specific housing, childcare, and community-serving projects.

    $85,213 spent
    2% of program spending
  4. Ew gives: ew's staff and board supported partner organizations through fundraising, volunteer service, and professional advocacy. In 2024, ew raised and directed funds to organizations advancing housing justice, childcare access, and community well-being, including the housing development consortium, the ethiopian community in seattle, sno-valley senior center, and other nonprofits serving low-income families and elders. Through ew gives, staff also offered direct community support, including event participation, technical advice, and connections to resources.

    $4,938 spentof which $4,938 as grants
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,554,834.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.1M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 106 ($3.3M) Expenses 112 ($3.2M) Net assets 110 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 136 ($4.2M) Expenses 139 ($4.0M) Net assets 124 ($1.6M)2020 Revenue 152 ($4.7M) Expenses 167 ($4.8M) Net assets 126 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 160 ($5.0M) Expenses 158 ($4.5M) Net assets 152 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 205 ($6.3M) Expenses 207 ($5.9M) Net assets 194 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 176 ($5.4M) Expenses 210 ($6.0M) Net assets 151 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 227 ($7.0M) Expenses 232 ($6.6M) Net assets 192 ($2.5M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (227)Expenses (232)Net assets (192)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $2.1M to $2.7M (+30%).

$1.6M
$1.7M
$2.1M
$2.7M
$2.7M
$3.2M
$2.7M
$3.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$250k
’17
$105k
’18
$237k
’19
−$37k
’20
$461k
’21
$437k
’22
−$523k
’23
$427k
’24
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jess Zimbabwe

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1517171619171918
Joined·+5+2+3+6+2+6+3
No longer listed·3243444
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $29 → $17.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $107 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS has grown faster than half of the 3,973 housing & shelter nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · below the median
Months of reserve1.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,973 housing & shelter nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $32k on record — $25k federal, $7k state.

Federal$25k
grants $25kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$25k
State$7k
Top programs
  • FACILITIES MAINTENANCE$7k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

39%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Firestation Seven Associates · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS?
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS (Washington) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $107 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($107). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $107 in grants to ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $107 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing