Washington · Nonprofit
ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES
ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $144,282 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($77,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES has grown faster than half of the 1,550 employment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,550 employment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Yakima Rotary Charitiesshared funderslocal
- St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resourcesportfolio match
- Sourceamericaportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 43% · 2018 56% · 2019 47% · 2020 53% · 2021 61% · 2022 93% · 2023 94% · 2024 94%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
95% of ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (15% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $23k → $16.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 50% · 2021 91% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
54% of ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $67k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Washington funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $78k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 197 organizations that share them.
- Yakima Rotary Charitiesshared funderslocalWA · backs 10 organizations that share your funders · funds 14 organizations near you
- St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resourcesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Sourceamericaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Covenant Ministries of Benevolenceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Resource Connections Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Inclusa Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Good Shepherd Fdn of Ohioportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Prince George's Provider Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Community Fund Management Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Disability Institute Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wright-Hennepin Electric Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
85% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES?
- ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $144,282 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($77,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $144,282 in grants to ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES?
- YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $77,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ENTRUST COMMUNITY SERVICES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing