California · Nonprofit
ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY
ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $673,384 to it, the largest being Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation ($523,235). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,762 public benefit nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,762 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- California Court Appointed Special Advocate Associationshared funders
- Sunkara Family Foundationportfolio match
- Kurz Charitable Trust & Foundation 10018300portfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
97% of ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (84% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $35 → $27.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 62% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY's grant income comes from California funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $100k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- California Court Appointed Special Advocate Associationshared fundersCA · backs 17 organizations that share your funders
- Sunkara Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kurz Charitable Trust & Foundation 10018300portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ariko Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Earthwatch Institute Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Joseph and Marie Field Family Environmental Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lippincott Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Planet Womenportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Courtney Roberts and Steve Preston Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Corduroy Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Graber Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wamuemra Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
80% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY?
- ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $673,384 to it, the largest being Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation ($523,235). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $673,384 in grants to ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY?
- Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $523,235 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS ACTING LOCALLY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing