Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Dzokden

Dzokden (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,359 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($13,340). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$260k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$13k
Net assets
$365k
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Dzokden does

Mission

The specific purposes for which this corporation is organized are religious ones, to wit: Dzokden is dedicated to spreading and teaching Kalachakra emphasizing the Tibetan Vajrayana Buddhist Jonang lineage, and consistent with the teachings, techniques and methods of Khentrul Jamphel Lodro (Jia Luo Show.)

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Promotion of Kalachakra Tantra Buddhism under the Jonang tradition through activities which includes, but is not limited to, providing religious instruction and places for community development and practice, special events for both new and established students, translation of sacred texts and spreading Tibetan Buddhism worldwide.

    $264,578 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $264,578.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($197k) Expenses 100 ($55k) Net assets 100 ($366k)2022 Revenue 56 ($110k) Expenses 185 ($102k) Net assets 102 ($374k)2023 Revenue 192 ($380k) Expenses 303 ($167k) Net assets 159 ($582k)2024 Revenue 123 ($243k) Expenses 704 ($388k) Net assets 120 ($437k)2025 Revenue 132 ($260k) Expenses 603 ($332k) Net assets 100 ($365k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (132)Expenses (603)Net assets (100)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $374k to $582k (+56%).

$366k
$374k
$582k
$438k
$366k
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

40% of Dzokden’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,288 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$142k
’21
$8k
’22
$213k
’23
−$144k
’24
−$72k
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Chloe Bregman

Chief Executive Officer/President

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

20212022202320242025
Listed55455
Joined·+0+0+2+0
No longer listed·0110
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Dzokden’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Dzokden leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Dzokden's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $19 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Dzokden is better cushioned than half of the 7,334 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−28% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve10.2mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,334 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Dzokden

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

72% of spending goes to programs.

Program 72%Management 28%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Dzokden: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Dzokden?
Dzokden (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,359 to it, the largest being GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION ($13,340). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Dzokden have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $13,359 in grants to Dzokden.
Who is the largest funder of Dzokden?
GORDON E AND BETTY I MOORE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $13,340 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Dzokden find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Dzokden →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing