Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Utah · Nonprofit

Dialogue Foundation

Dialogue Foundation (Utah) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $320,593 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($162,720). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$176k
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$321k
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
6/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%

Against its field

Dialogue Foundation runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve8.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($217k) Expenses 100 ($149k) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 77 ($168k) Expenses 97 ($145k) Net assets 94 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 62 ($135k) Expenses 113 ($168k) Net assets 102 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 73 ($159k) Expenses 83 ($124k) Net assets 108 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 191 ($414k) Expenses 102 ($153k) Net assets 129 ($1.7M)2022 Revenue 64 ($139k) Expenses 103 ($154k) Net assets 116 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 97 ($211k) Expenses 101 ($151k) Net assets 124 ($1.6M)2024 Revenue 81 ($176k) Expenses 111 ($166k) Net assets 118 ($1.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (81)Expenses (111)Net assets (118)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

57% of Dialogue Foundation’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$68k
17
$23k
18
$33k
19
$35k
20
$261k
21
$15k
22
$60k
23
$11k
24
8.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $100 → $24k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)97% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Dialogue Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Dialogue Foundation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Dialogue Foundation.

51%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 93% · 2021 62% · 2022 90% · 2023 53%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of Dialogue Foundation's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $11k that is directly attributable, 65% of it comes from funders outside Utah, across 3 states.

WA
CA
UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $310k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Dialogue Foundation

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 25%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Dialogue Foundation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Dialogue Foundation?
Dialogue Foundation (Utah) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $320,593 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($162,720). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Dialogue Foundation have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $320,593 in grants to Dialogue Foundation, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Dialogue Foundation?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $162,720 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Dialogue Foundation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing