Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS

CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,437,398 to it, the largest being FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC ($701,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$965k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
$679k
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 100%
01What it does

What Convergence Analysis does

Mission

Convergence Analysis mission is to improve the long-term prospects of human civilization to survive and thrive. Its specific objectives and purposes shall be: (1) To analyze existing academic research and conduct interdisciplinary basic research into the future of human civilization; (2) To apply our findings to the study of risks to civilization, particularly in order to understand how to prevent these risks; (3)To educate the public about our findings through public presentations of our research

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Modeling cooperation: Conduct research into improving cooperation in society between different groups developing advanced Artificial Intelligence (AI). 1. The baseline AI competition model was substantially revised, and a tool for running Monte Carlo simulations of the former was introduced. 2. Completed an early draft of the paper on Windfall clauses, and drafted a technical manual for the baseline model. 3. Shared modeling methods with and discussed with and advised other governance researchers.

    $113,591 spent
    23% of program spending
  2. Technologies for Pandemic Defence: Conducting research into pandemics and technologies for improving existential outcomes. Including simulating outbreaks, analysing pandemic economics, developing policy proposals. Writing, advisory and advocacy activities relating to this research.

    $86,446 spent
    18% of program spending
  3. Existential risk strategy research: Produce societally valuable insights on managing advanced technologies, especially Artificial Intelligence (AI), and spread these insights to decision makers and society as a whole. 1. We performed research into AI developments and understanding the risks to human civilization from these developments. 2. We advised organizations on the forefront of AI technologies on ethical and safe decision making regarding advanced AI technologies.

    $284,517 spent
    59% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $484,554.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($174k) Expenses 100 ($15k) Net assets 100 ($159k)2021 Revenue 466 ($809k) Expenses 393 ($60k) Net assets 572 ($909k)2022 Revenue 145 ($251k) Expenses 897 ($136k) Net assets 644 ($1.0M)2023 Revenue 194 ($336k) Expenses 4398 ($668k) Net assets 435 ($692k)2024 Revenue 556 ($965k) Expenses 6440 ($978k) Net assets 427 ($679k)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (556)Expenses (6440)Net assets (427)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $159k to $909k (+472%).

$159k
$909k
$1.0M
$692k
$679k
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$158k
’20
$750k
’21
$115k
’22
−$332k
’23
−$13k
’24
5.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2021 and FY2022 filings.

2021202220232024
Listed5555
Joined·+2+0+2
No longer listed·202
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $50k → $86k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 92% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS.

49%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 68% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $116k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.3M arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 22,812 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Months of reserve5.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)54% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 23%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS?
CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,437,398 to it, the largest being FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC ($701,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $1,437,398 in grants to CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS?
FOUNDERS PLEDGE INC is the largest funder on record, with $701,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Convergence Analysis →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing