Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK

CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $743,890 to it, the largest being THE SKYSCRAPE FOUNDATION FORMERLY THE MARIE D JEFFREY FOUNDATION ($284,950). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$163k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$744k
Net assets
$77k
4/5 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Conservation Action Research Network does

Mission

To understand the biotic processes that underlie and maintain the diversity of life worldwide, especially in the tropics, and to use this knowledge to address global environmental and sustainability challenges.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Aspire supporting conservation science in africa: carn supports science in central africa by providing small grants to african scientists and supporting logistics for scientists working country. We provide grants to young african researchers. Grant makers explanation for monitoring use of funds outside us carn requires grantees to provide mid-term and final financial and programmatic reporting on their use of aspire funds using templates we provide. We also request that grantees send any scientific publication that result from their aspire funding, even after the grant and reporting period is finished. Finally, we occasionally conduct surveys of past grantees to assess the impact our grants have on their careers and productivity.wells and waterthis program aims to facilitate access to water by villages participating in a native tree planting project by building wells located strategically near communities. The wells are built by a local vetted contractor and members of the team visited the site and verified and reported with pictures and videos on the work performed. Conservation geneticsconservation genetics: carn supported numerous projects to use advanced geneticstechniques to…

    $127,796 spentof which $123,698 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $127,796.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($189k) Expenses 100 ($135k) Net assets 100 ($76k)2018 Revenue 89 ($167k) Expenses 81 ($110k) Net assets 175 ($133k)2019 Revenue 80 ($151k) Expenses 108 ($147k) Net assets 181 ($137k)2020 Revenue 48 ($90k) Expenses 102 ($138k) Net assets 119 ($90k)2021 Revenue 95 ($178k) Expenses 117 ($158k) Net assets 146 ($111k)2022 Revenue 108 ($204k) Expenses 188 ($254k) Net assets 79 ($60k)2023 Revenue 83 ($157k) Expenses 138 ($186k) Net assets 41 ($31k)2024 Revenue 76 ($144k) Expenses 96 ($130k) Net assets 60 ($45k)2025 Revenue 86 ($163k) Expenses 97 ($132k) Net assets 101 ($77k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (86)Expenses (97)Net assets (101)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $76k to $133k (+75%).

$76k
$133k
$137k
$90k
$111k
$60k
$31k
$75k
$77k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$53k
’17
$57k
’18
$4k
’19
−$47k
’20
$21k
’21
−$51k
’22
−$29k
’23
$14k
’24
$31k
’25
2.8
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $65k → $163k.

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

25% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK.

38%
largest funder
89%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 92% · 2018 59% · 2019 60% · 2020 100% · 2021 70% · 2022 81% · 2023 57% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 4 states in all.

CA
VA
DE
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $107k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin19% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $213k on record.

Federal$213k
grants $213kcontracts $0
17
18
19
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$213k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK?
CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $743,890 to it, the largest being THE SKYSCRAPE FOUNDATION FORMERLY THE MARIE D JEFFREY FOUNDATION ($284,950). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $743,890 in grants to CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK?
THE SKYSCRAPE FOUNDATION FORMERLY THE MARIE D JEFFREY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $284,950 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CONSERVATION ACTION RESEARCH NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Conservation Action Research Network →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing