Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION
CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,000 to it, the largest being TIDES ADVOCACY ($50,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $156k
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $130k
- Net assets
- $820
What Climate Hawks Vote Civic Action does
Mission
Environmental and civic rights advocacy with regard to protecting the climate.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Program
We mobilized people to write and call their congressional representatives in support of/in oppostion to various bills introduced in congress, including build back better and other federal climate legislation.
$0 spent
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $0.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $15k to $42k (+184%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $20k → $7k.
From the IRS filings of CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION?
- CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $130,000 to it, the largest being TIDES ADVOCACY ($50,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $130,000 in grants to CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION?
- TIDES ADVOCACY is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CLIMATE HAWKS VOTE CIVIC ACTION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Climate Hawks Vote Civic Action →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing