Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Minnesota · Nonprofit

CIVIC ARK

CIVIC ARK (Minnesota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $124,218 to it, the largest being THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ($90,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$63k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$124k
Grants received
$5k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 68%

Against its field

CIVIC ARK runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,039 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · above the median
Months of reserve1.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,039 civil rights nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($73k) Expenses 100 ($87k) Net assets 100 ($41k)2020 Revenue 100 ($73k) Expenses 84 ($73k) Net assets 25 ($10k)2021 Revenue 607 ($441k) Expenses 453 ($395k) Net assets 110 ($45k)2022 Revenue 117 ($85k) Expenses 88 ($76k) Net assets 152 ($63k)2023 Revenue 111 ($80k) Expenses 89 ($77k) Net assets 159 ($66k)2024 Revenue 86 ($63k) Expenses 70 ($61k) Net assets 12 ($5k)
201820202021202220232024
Revenue (86)Expenses (70)Net assets (12)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of CIVIC ARK’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,441 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$15k
18
$0
20
$45k
21
$9k
22
$3k
23
$2k
24
1.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $34k → $15k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'24*
total
funders
3
3
1
2
1
1

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)72% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CIVIC ARK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CIVIC ARK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

93% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CIVIC ARK.

72%
largest funder
93%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 87% · 2018 91% · 2019 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

72% of CIVIC ARK's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $34k that is directly attributable, 67% of it comes from funders outside Minnesota, across 3 states.

WA
MN
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
Minnesota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $90k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CIVIC ARK

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

63% of spending goes to programs.

Program 63%Management 37%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CIVIC ARK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CIVIC ARK?
CIVIC ARK (Minnesota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $124,218 to it, the largest being THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ($90,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CIVIC ARK have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $124,218 in grants to CIVIC ARK, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CIVIC ARK?
THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $90,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CIVIC ARK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing