Skip to content

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY

CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY (Wisconsin) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $79,250 to it, the largest being BA & ESTHER GREENHECK FOUNDATION ($45,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$99k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$79k
Net assets
$99k
6/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 27%
01What it does

What Christmas in July Charity does

Mission

2024 Funding for (10) priority items for the Children's Hospital

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Completely funded the 10 priority items identified by the Children's Hospital, 1) Disinfecting Cabinet, 2)Switch toys, 3) Library Media Box, 4) Rockin' Robin Chair 5) Hand Casting Mold Supplies, 6) Book Resources, 7) Bravery Bead Program, 8) Indoor Playground Swing, 9) Butterfly Pig Items, 10) Concerto Vibes Chimes

    $7,076 spentof which $99,252 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $7,076.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($58k) Net assets 100 ($58k)2022 Revenue 144 ($84k) Net assets 144 ($84k)2023 Revenue 165 ($96k) Net assets 165 ($96k)2024 Revenue 170 ($99k) Net assets 170 ($99k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (170)Net assets (170)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $58k to $84k (+44%).

$58k
$84k
$96k
$99k
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,248 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$58k
’21
$84k
’22
$96k
’23
$99k
’24
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $7k → $26k.

2 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 84%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

27% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY.

57%
largest funder
84%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 71% · 2021 34% · 2022 67% · 2023 38% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY's funders are still giving 2 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY's grant income comes from Wisconsin funders.

IL
WI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Wisconsin out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $22k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY has grown faster than three-quarters of the 9,907 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin100% · outside the comparable range
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,907 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY?
CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY (Wisconsin) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $79,250 to it, the largest being BA & ESTHER GREENHECK FOUNDATION ($45,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $79,250 in grants to CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY?
BA & ESTHER GREENHECK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $45,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHRISTMAS IN JULY CHARITY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Christmas in July Charity →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing