Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

Chatham Friends of the Parks

Chatham Friends of the Parks (Illinois) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,207 to it, the largest being CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ($7,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$91k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$12k
Grants received
$214k
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%

Against its field

Chatham Friends of the Parks runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 13,243 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,243 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($67k) Expenses 100 ($46k) Net assets 100 ($91k)2020 Revenue 139 ($93k) Expenses 46 ($21k) Net assets 179 ($163k)2021 Revenue 67 ($45k) Expenses 185 ($84k) Net assets 136 ($124k)2022 Revenue 69 ($46k) Expenses 44 ($20k) Net assets 165 ($150k)2023 Revenue 99 ($66k) Expenses 32 ($14k) Net assets 221 ($202k)2024 Revenue 136 ($91k) Expenses 172 ($78k) Net assets 235 ($214k)
201920202021202220232024
Revenue (136)Expenses (172)Net assets (235)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

56% of Chatham Friends of the Parks’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,007 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$21k
19
$72k
20
$39k
21
$26k
22
$52k
23
$12k
24
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $2k → $7k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Chatham Friends of the Parks’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Chatham Friends of the Parks leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

59% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Chatham Friends of the Parks.

57%
largest funder
98%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 98% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 99%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

59% of Chatham Friends of the Parks's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5k that is directly attributable, 80% of it comes from funders outside Illinois, across 2 states.

IL
NY

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Chatham Friends of the Parks

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

12%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Chatham Friends of the Parks: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Chatham Friends of the Parks?
Chatham Friends of the Parks (Illinois) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,207 to it, the largest being CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ($7,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 59% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Chatham Friends of the Parks have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $12,207 in grants to Chatham Friends of the Parks, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Chatham Friends of the Parks?
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA is the largest funder on record, with $7,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Chatham Friends of the Parks find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing