Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION

CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $538 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($538). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2023
$5.1M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$538
Net assets
$0
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Chariton Valley Association does

Mission

To empower people with disabilities to achieve their highest level of independence through high quality and diverse support services.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2022 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

On january 1 2023 the organization merged with center for human services and cease operations as Chariton Valley Association.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Individualized supported living isl - isl homes are designed to serve one to four individuals and are located in residential single family neighborhoods. A supervisor coordinates the individuals' care staff schedules and commuity integration as well as staff support. Individuals living in isl homes are provided up to 24 hours per day support based upon the needs of the individuals. The goal is to enable the individuals to live safe healthy lives in a clean environment while promoting independence and integration in the local community.

    $3,040,049 spent$4,038,738 earned by the program
    79% of program spending
  2. A host home program afffords the opportunity for a person with a disability to choose to live with an individual couple or a family in the community to share their life experiences together. The individual thus becomes a valued member of the home family and develops permanent relationships that then help that individual grow and develop. The family receives a monthly stipend plus room and board for suporting the individual with disabilities in their home. Chariton valley professional management staff oversees services ensures compliance with state and federal guidelines and provides ongoing support to the family and individuals.

    $413,452 spent$514,627 earned by the program
    11% of program spending
  3. Independent living skills development ilsd - types of services and supports provided include skill training in activities of daily living including but not limited to: hygiene menu planning meal preparation home environment laundry budgeting and camparison shopping. Transportation assistance is also provided for essential errands such as doctor's appointments grocery shopping stops at the pharmacy and often to and from work.

    $359,996 spent$436,668 earned by the program
    9% of program spending
  4. | description:, expense amount:, grants amount:, revenue amount:| form 990 part iii line 4d other program services: employment services and other misceellaneous services. Expenses $17,588. Including grants of $0. Revenue $52,710, $17588, $0, $52710|

    $17,588 spent$52,710 earned by the program
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,831,085.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.3M) Expenses 100 ($4.7M) Net assets 100 ($2.6M)2018 Revenue 114 ($6.1M) Expenses 122 ($5.8M) Net assets 113 ($2.9M)2019 Revenue 131 ($7.0M) Expenses 141 ($6.6M) Net assets 127 ($3.3M)2020 Revenue 137 ($7.3M) Expenses 148 ($7.0M) Net assets 141 ($3.6M)2021 Revenue 155 ($8.3M) Expenses 161 ($7.6M) Net assets 166 ($4.3M)2022 Revenue 95 ($5.1M) Expenses 96 ($4.5M) Net assets 0 ($0)2023 Revenue 95 ($5.1M) Expenses 96 ($4.5M) Net assets 0 ($0)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (95)Expenses (96)Net assets (0)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $5.0M to $0 (−100%).

$3.1M
$3.6M
$4.1M
$5.4M
$5.0M
$0
$0
2017201820192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 1% · 2020 0% · 2021 4% · 2022 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$627k
’17
$347k
’18
$362k
’19
$344k
’20
$670k
’21
$533k
’22
$533k
’23
4.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201820192020202120222023
Listed13131314141013
Joined·+0+3+4+0+1+4
No longer listed·033051
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $20 → $160.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $538 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 10,790 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,790 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023

Organizations like CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 15%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION?
CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION (Missouri) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $538 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($538). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $538 in grants to CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $538 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CHARITON VALLEY ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Chariton Valley Association →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing