Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Chamber Music in Napa Valley

Chamber Music in Napa Valley (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $382,010 to it, the largest being ROBERT LEE HUDSON FOUNDATION ($295,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$490k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$382k
Net assets
$1.1M
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 41%
01What it does

What Chamber Music in Napa Valley does

Mission

The mission of Chamber Music in Napa Valley is to provide world-class chamber music for local residents of the Napa Valley.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Programs

  1. In our 45th season, Chamber Music in Napa Valley presented ten concerts from November 2025 to April 2026, featuring Paul Lewis, the Takcs Quartet, the Jupiter and Jasper String Quartets, Garrick Ohlsson, Emanuel Ax, Yefim Bronfman, Cuarteto Casals, Louis Lortie, Benjamin Grosvenor, and the Vertavo String Quartet. More than 175 donors contributed almost $150,000, and our commitment to keeping concerts affordable and accessible means ticket sales make up less than 1/3 of the budget, with the balance carried by donors and the endowment. CMNV continued its deep support of new music this year, with commissions from Anders Hillborgs Piano Concerto, Marc-Andr Hamelin, Anna Clyne, and a co-commission from Clarice Assad with the Takcs Quartet, and a new arrangement of Dvork by Thomas Prechal.

    $340,822 spent$124,159 earned by the program
    88% of program spending
  2. The music in the schools program brought world-class artists into Napa schools for outreach concerts, introducing young audiences to classical music. This program is now in cooperation with Music in the Vineyards.

    $46,441 spent
    12% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $387,263.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($302k) Expenses 100 ($297k) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 104 ($313k) Expenses 150 ($444k) Net assets 98 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 127 ($382k) Expenses 101 ($300k) Net assets 103 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 124 ($373k) Expenses 116 ($343k) Net assets 102 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 37 ($111k) Expenses 83 ($247k) Net assets 111 ($1.8M)2022 Revenue 91 ($274k) Expenses 123 ($364k) Net assets 86 ($1.4M)2023 Revenue 69 ($209k) Expenses 159 ($472k) Net assets 83 ($1.4M)2024 Revenue 144 ($436k) Expenses 190 ($564k) Net assets 80 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 107 ($323k) Expenses 180 ($534k) Net assets 69 ($1.2M)2026 Revenue 162 ($490k) Expenses 154 ($456k) Net assets 66 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (162)Expenses (154)Net assets (66)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.8M to $1.4M (−22%).

$1.7M
$1.7M
$1.8M
$1.7M
$1.8M
$1.4M
$1.4M
$1.3M
$1.2M
$1.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
’17
−$131k
’18
$81k
’19
$30k
’20
−$136k
’21
−$90k
’22
−$263k
’23
−$128k
’24
−$211k
’25
$34k
’26
0.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed3333333333
Joined·+0+0+0+1+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·000100000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income held at $45k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Chamber Music in Napa Valley’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Chamber Music in Napa Valley leans on a few funders — its largest provides 77% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

77%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 78% · 2018 77% · 2019 72% · 2020 49% · 2021 88% · 2022 87% · 2023 89% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Chamber Music in Napa Valley draws 81% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

CA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like Chamber Music in Napa Valley

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 15%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

56%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Chamber Music in Napa Valley: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Chamber Music in Napa Valley?
Chamber Music in Napa Valley (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $382,010 to it, the largest being ROBERT LEE HUDSON FOUNDATION ($295,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Chamber Music in Napa Valley have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $382,010 in grants to Chamber Music in Napa Valley, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Chamber Music in Napa Valley?
ROBERT LEE HUDSON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $295,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Chamber Music in Napa Valley find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing