Skip to content

Minnesota · Nonprofit

Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program

Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program (Minnesota) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $54,999 to it, the largest being Minnesota Council on Foundations ($39,999). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$595k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$55k
Net assets
$6k
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%
01What it does

What Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program does

Mission

Neighborhood revitalization to support residents and stakeholders of the Cedar Riverside neighborhood of Minneapolis

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Neighborhood revitalization to support residents and stakeholders of the West Bank neighborhood of Minneapolis Provide culturally appropriate tools and resources to promote civic engagement, leadership development, and equitable access to economic and educational opportunities for all its constituents

    $423,048 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $423,048.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($121k) Expenses 100 ($199k) Net assets 100 ($63k)2018 Revenue 27 ($33k) Expenses 47 ($93k) Net assets 0 ($0)2019 Revenue 87 ($105k) Expenses 56 ($112k) Net assets -10 ($-6501)2020 Revenue 212 ($258k) Expenses 133 ($265k) Net assets -21 ($-13408)2021 Revenue 160 ($194k) Expenses 97 ($193k) Net assets -15 ($-9505)2022 Revenue 217 ($263k) Expenses 133 ($264k) Net assets -17 ($-10743)2023 Revenue 405 ($492k) Expenses 250 ($497k) Net assets -17 ($-10882)2024 Revenue 490 ($595k) Expenses 308 ($613k) Net assets 10 ($6k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (490)Expenses (308)Net assets (10)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $63k to $0 (−100%).

$63k
$0
$6k
$12k
$16k
$0
$14k
$9k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 91% · 2021 71% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,439 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$78k
’17
−$60k
’18
−$7k
’19
−$7k
’20
$902
’21
−$1k
’22
−$5k
’23
−$18k
’24
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

AJ Awed

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20202021202220232024
Listed1515151514
Joined·+2+5+2+5
No longer listed·2526
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $15k → $40k.

Funder
'20
'21
total
funders
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 27% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program.

73%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program's grant income comes from Minnesota funders.

MN

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $15k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program has grown faster than three-quarters of the 11,971 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,971 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Minnesota

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 24%Fundraising 7%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program?
Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program (Minnesota) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $54,999 to it, the largest being Minnesota Council on Foundations ($39,999). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $54,999 in grants to Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program.
Who is the largest funder of Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program?
Minnesota Council on Foundations is the largest funder on record, with $39,999 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Cedar Riverside Neighborhood Revitalization Program find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Minnesota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing