Iowa · Nonprofit
CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX
CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX (Iowa) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $285,040 to it, the largest being MITCHELL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ($112,316). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX is better cushioned than half of the 1,432 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,432 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- United Way of North Central Iowashared funders
- The Chelsea Health and Wellness Foundationportfolio match
- Northwest Minnesota Arts Councilportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
76% of CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $22k → $23k.
3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 47% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 87%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
87% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 55% · 2018 53% · 2019 50% · 2020 55% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 61% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
92% of CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX's grant income comes from Iowa funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $135k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- United Way of North Central Iowashared fundersIA · backs 17 organizations that share your funders
- The Chelsea Health and Wellness Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northwest Minnesota Arts Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- East Central Regional Arts Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arlin Falck Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Annmarie Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Southwest Minnesota Arts Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Allison Everett Pearson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Community Foundation for Crawford Countyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- William M & Donna J Hoaglin Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Happy Valley Adventure Bureauportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Iowa
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
86%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 6 related entities
- City of Osage · exempt
- Osage Community School District · exempt
- Mitchell County Agricultural Society · exempt
- Osage Municipal Utilities · exempt
- Osage Educational Foundation · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX?
- CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX (Iowa) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $285,040 to it, the largest being MITCHELL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ($112,316). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $285,040 in grants to CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX?
- MITCHELL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY is the largest funder on record, with $112,316 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CEDAR RIVER RECREATION AND FINE ARTS COMPLEX find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Iowa. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing