Kentucky · Nonprofit
CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC
CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $10,000 to it, the largest being CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC has grown faster than half of the 9,089 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,089 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Wood & Marie Hannah Foundationlocalportfolio match
- The Gheens Foundation Inclocal
- Robert and Faye Thieneman Family Foundation Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
0% of CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Where its funders are
100% of CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC's grant income comes from Kentucky funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Wood & Marie Hannah Foundationlocalportfolio matchKY · funds 60 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- The Gheens Foundation InclocalKY · funds 234 organizations near you
- Robert and Faye Thieneman Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Good Shepherd Fdn of Ohioportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The William E Barth Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- John Allan Love Charitable Fdn Attn Bradportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Inclusa Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Home Builders Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resourcesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mackin Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jacob C Koch Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Irvin F & Alice S Etscorn Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Kentucky
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
85%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Part of a family of 17 related entities
- Cedar Lake Inc · exempt
- Cedar Lake Lodge Inc · exempt
- Cedar Lake Residences Inc · exempt
- Cedar Lake Foundation Inc · exempt
- Cedar Lake Abigail Inc · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC?
- CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $10,000 to it, the largest being CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC have?
- IRS filings report 1 organization giving $10,000 in grants to CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC.
- Who is the largest funder of CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC?
- CEDAR LAKE FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CEDAR LAKE - MONTICELLO PARKE INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kentucky. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing