Loading…
Loading…
Nebraska · Nonprofit
BUFFETT EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND (Nebraska) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $260,047,699 in grants to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($251,434,486). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BUFFETT EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND is funded by 2 grantmakers reporting $260.0M in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 98 philanthropy nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$30M from 1 funders in 2025, up from $31M and 2 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of BUFFETT EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BUFFETT EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 97% · 2019 98% · 2020 100% · 2021 97% · 2022 100% · 2023 91% · 2024 91% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BUFFETT EARLY CHILDHOOD FUND is locally rooted: 97% of its grant income comes from Nebraska funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing