Loading…
Loading…
North Dakota · Nonprofit
BRIDGING THE GAP (North Dakota) is funded by 6 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $29,410 in grants to it, the largest being ALEX STERN FAMILY FOUNDATION ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
BRIDGING THE GAP runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 14,240 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,240 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
The base broadened — 1 funders to 4 as grant income moved $200 → $21k.
1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of BRIDGING THE GAP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BRIDGING THE GAP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 34% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 62% · 2024 48% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BRIDGING THE GAP is locally rooted: 90% of its grant income comes from North Dakota funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing