Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Virginia · Nonprofit

BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER

BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER (Virginia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $71,604 to it, the largest being PAYPAL Charitable Giving Fund ($52,397). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$70k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$72k
Grants received
$22k
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%

Against its field

BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER has grown faster than three-quarters of the 647 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin100% · outside the comparable range
Revenue growth (annualized)31% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 647 civil rights nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($8k) Expenses 100 ($947) Net assets 100 ($7k)2018 Revenue 38 ($3k) Expenses 539 ($5k) Net assets 72 ($5k)2019 Revenue 69 ($6k) Expenses 302 ($3k) Net assets 111 ($8k)2020 Revenue 25 ($2k) Expenses 186 ($2k) Net assets 115 ($8k)2021 Revenue 634 ($52k) Expenses 4952 ($47k) Net assets 114 ($8k)2022 Revenue 748 ($61k) Expenses 5218 ($49k) Net assets 273 ($20k)2023 Revenue 482 ($39k) Expenses 3900 ($37k) Net assets 304 ($22k)2024 Revenue 618 ($50k) Expenses 6033 ($57k) Net assets 207 ($15k)2025 Revenue 855 ($70k) Expenses 0 ($0) Net assets 309 ($22k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (855)Expenses (0)Net assets (309)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,441 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$7k
17
$2k
18
$3k
19
$281
20
$5k
21
$11k
22
$2k
23
$7k
24
$70k
25
56
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $191 → $9k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
2
2
1

3 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER.

73%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 98%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $72k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 2 states

OH
VA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER?
BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER (Virginia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $71,604 to it, the largest being PAYPAL Charitable Giving Fund ($52,397). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $71,604 in grants to BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER?
PAYPAL Charitable Giving Fund is the largest funder on record, with $52,397 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BLUE TULIP HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing