Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE

BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $38,960 to it, the largest being The Excelsior German Center at the Altenheim ($18,862). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.2M
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$39k
Grants received
$585k
Net assets
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Against its field

BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE is better cushioned than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−2% · below the median
Months of reserve5.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($852k) Expenses 100 ($789k) Net assets 100 ($602k)2020 Revenue 87 ($738k) Expenses 95 ($747k) Net assets 99 ($594k)2021 Revenue 88 ($750k) Expenses 89 ($704k) Net assets 106 ($640k)2022 Revenue 111 ($944k) Expenses 113 ($890k) Net assets 115 ($694k)2023 Revenue 116 ($988k) Expenses 128 ($1.0M) Net assets 112 ($675k)2024 Revenue 122 ($1.0M) Expenses 140 ($1.1M) Net assets 101 ($610k)2025 Revenue 137 ($1.2M) Expenses 150 ($1.2M) Net assets 97 ($585k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (137)Expenses (150)Net assets (97)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2022 11% · 2023 7% · 2024 4% · 2025 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

7% of BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$63k
19
$9k
20
$46k
21
$54k
22
$19k
23
$64k
24
$21k
25
5.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $5k → $1k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

64% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE.

48%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 75% · 2021 75% · 2022 95% · 2023 98%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

57% of BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 9%Fundraising 1%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE?
BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $38,960 to it, the largest being The Excelsior German Center at the Altenheim ($18,862). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $38,960 in grants to BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE?
The Excelsior German Center at the Altenheim is the largest funder on record, with $18,862 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BAY AREA KINDERSTUBE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing