Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER

AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $280,573 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($255,171). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 95% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$148k
Revenue FY2022
4
Funders on record
$281k
Grants received
$0
Net assets
1/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 44%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($162k) Expenses 100 ($221k) Net assets 100 ($19k)2018 Revenue 137 ($223k) Expenses 95 ($210k) Net assets 165 ($32k)2019 Revenue 175 ($283k) Expenses 116 ($256k) Net assets 406 ($78k)2020 Revenue 215 ($348k) Expenses 140 ($308k) Net assets 659 ($127k)2021 Revenue 144 ($234k) Expenses 146 ($322k) Net assets 203 ($39k)2022 Revenue 91 ($148k) Expenses 85 ($187k) Net assets 0 ($0)
201720182019202020212022
Revenue (91)Expenses (85)Net assets (0)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 1% · 2021 28%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$59k
17
$12k
18
$28k
19
$40k
20
$88k
21
$39k
22
1.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $15k → $15k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)95% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

96% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER.

91%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 90% · 2022 65%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

95% of AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $15k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 2 states.

VA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $265k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER?
AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $280,573 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($255,171). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 95% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $280,573 in grants to AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER?
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY is the largest funder on record, with $255,171 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like AUSTIN COMMUNITY DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing