Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION

ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $165,613 to it, the largest being STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC ($130,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.5M
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$166k
Grants received
$-256688
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%

Against its field

ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 611 unclassified nonprofits its size.

Operating margin10% · above the median
Months of reserve3.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)31% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 611 unclassified nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($372k) Expenses 100 ($334k) Net assets 100 ($61k)2018 Revenue 50 ($188k) Expenses 38 ($127k) Net assets 199 ($122k)2019 Revenue 69 ($255k) Expenses 93 ($311k) Net assets 107 ($65k)2020 Revenue 93 ($346k) Expenses 102 ($341k) Net assets -27 ($-16595)2021 Revenue 123 ($456k) Expenses 226 ($755k) Net assets -518 ($-316156)2022 Revenue 64 ($237k) Expenses 178 ($592k) Net assets -1101 ($-671817)2023 Revenue 459 ($1.7M) Expenses 461 ($1.5M) Net assets -824 ($-502276)2024 Revenue 672 ($2.5M) Expenses 676 ($2.3M) Net assets -421 ($-256688)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (672)Expenses (676)Net assets (-421)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 34%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

4% of ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (71% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 638 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$38k
17
$61k
18
$56k
19
$5k
20
$300k
21
$356k
22
$170k
23
$246k
24
3.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $1k → $23.

Funder
'17
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
Nfl Foundation Incunclassified
$11k
funders
1
2
2
3
2
1
1
1

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

78%
largest funder
99%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 69% · 2020 100% · 2021 95% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

79% of ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
CA
TN
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
20
21
22
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $113 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

2
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION?
ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $165,613 to it, the largest being STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC ($130,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $165,613 in grants to ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION?
STANLEY W EKSTROM FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $130,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ATHLETES FOR LIFE FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing