Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
AREA CHURCHES TOGETHER IN ONE NETWO (Michigan) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $5,437 in grants to it, the largest being SPARTANNASH FOUNDATION ($5,395). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
AREA CHURCHES TOGETHER IN ONE NETWO has grown faster than half of the 5,795 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,795 religion nonprofits under $100k, FY2018
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 2 funders to 3 as grant income moved $0 → $3k.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of AREA CHURCHES TOGETHER IN ONE NETWO’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 2 of 4 funders by total. Association, not causation.
AREA CHURCHES TOGETHER IN ONE NETWO leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 99% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
AREA CHURCHES TOGETHER IN ONE NETWO is locally rooted: 99% of its grant income comes from Michigan funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2018 (financials across 2017–2018), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing