Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,000 to it, the largest being Unite Here ($20,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 363 civil rights nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 363 civil rights nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workersshared fundersportfolio match
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workersshared fundersportfolio match
- Int Union United Auto National Community Action Programshared fundersportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
36% of AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
Left out of every figure on this page: $5.9M from 4 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations). These are real filings, and they are not money AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE raised.
From the IRS filings of AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workersshared fundersportfolio matchDC · backs 12 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workersshared fundersportfolio matchDC · backs 25 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Int Union United Auto National Community Action Programshared fundersportfolio matchMI · backs 15 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clcshared fundersportfolio matchDC · backs 32 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Motion Picture Association Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Office and Professional Employees International Unionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mywirelessorgportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United States Telecom Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Unionshared fundersDC · backs 31 organizations that share your funders
- International Union of Elevator Constructorsshared fundersMD · backs 12 organizations that share your funders
- Laborers' International Union of North Americashared fundersDC · backs 10 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
73% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 2 related entities
- Afl-Cio · exempt
- Afl-Cio Working for America Institute · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE?
- AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,000 to it, the largest being Unite Here ($20,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $30,000 in grants to AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE?
- Unite Here is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like AFL-CIO TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing