Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

Academy for Professionalism in Health Care

Academy for Professionalism in Health Care (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $128 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($128). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$88k
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$128
Net assets
$154k
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Academy for Professionalism in Health Care does

Mission

Optimizing patient care through professionalism education, scholarship, policy, and practice in all health-related fields.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. To promote collaborative, multidisciplinary dialogue and research among professionalism educators. Members of the Academy are expected to engage in, individually or collectively the following activities: exploring intellectual questions pertaining to professionalism in health care, collecting, cataloging and distributing the broad spectrum of model curricula and other teaching materials in medical ethics and humanities toward professionalism developing educational syllabi, evaluation and assessment tools, methods, and strategies and assembling during annual and other APHC-sponsored meetings to promote collaboration, dialogue and research.

    $23,233 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. For APHC members and external stakeholders to improve educational efforts in medical school, residency, and faculty development programs to achieve the goal of promoting professionalism.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $23,233.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($58k) Expenses 100 ($54k) Net assets 100 ($13k)2018 Revenue 102 ($59k) Expenses 72 ($39k) Net assets 229 ($29k)2019 Revenue 149 ($86k) Expenses 137 ($73k) Net assets 334 ($43k)2020 Revenue 108 ($63k) Expenses 52 ($28k) Net assets 606 ($77k)2021 Revenue 79 ($46k) Expenses 64 ($35k) Net assets 692 ($88k)2022 Revenue 136 ($79k) Expenses 88 ($47k) Net assets 941 ($120k)2023 Revenue 173 ($100k) Expenses 130 ($70k) Net assets 1179 ($150k)2024 Revenue 164 ($95k) Expenses 167 ($90k) Net assets 1216 ($155k)2025 Revenue 152 ($88k) Expenses 164 ($88k) Net assets 1212 ($154k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (152)Expenses (164)Net assets (1212)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $43k to $77k (+81%).

$14k
$29k
$43k
$77k
$88k
$120k
$150k
$155k
$154k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

10% of Academy for Professionalism in Health Care’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,214 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
’17
$20k
’18
$12k
’19
$35k
’20
$11k
’21
$32k
’22
$30k
’23
$5k
’24
−$533
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $32 → $29.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Academy for Professionalism in Health Care’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Academy for Professionalism in Health Care's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $128 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Academy for Professionalism in Health Care has grown faster than half of the 6,360 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,360 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Academy for Professionalism in Health Care

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Academy for Professionalism in Health Care: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Academy for Professionalism in Health Care?
Academy for Professionalism in Health Care (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $128 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($128). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Academy for Professionalism in Health Care have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $128 in grants to Academy for Professionalism in Health Care, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Academy for Professionalism in Health Care?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $128 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Academy for Professionalism in Health Care find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Academy for Professionalism in Health Care →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing