· Private foundation
The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $611k
- $50k–250k15 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+5 grants · $3.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVA UNIVERSITY | $1,612,500 |
| COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| JEWISH MUSEUM | $500,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC | $250,000 |
| CLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC | $160,000 |
| PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL FOOTBALL LEAGUE | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| REUT USA | $75,000 |
| SIXPOINT INC | $75,000 |
| CONGREGATION ETZ CHAIM | $68,150 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK | $50,000 |
| JEWISH MUSEUM | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
97 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 52 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YUYESHIVA UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +39%
Vanderbilt University7× · 2017–2023 · $7.3M · revenue +74%- TJTHE JEWISH MUSEUM9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +99%
Funded once
- TUTHE UCLA FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $250k
- SCSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORKone grant, 2021 · $250k
- VUVANDERBILT UNIVERSITYone grant, 2021 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj and the most unlike its peers is Northside Boxing Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds VISUAL ARTS CENTER OF NEW JERSEY ↗
- Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
- Who funds American Friends Of Or National Missions ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 70 FACES MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds CLAL-THE NATIONAL JEWISH CENTER FOR LEARNING AND LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Communal Fund · The Wilf Family Foundation · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Mark and Jane Wilf Family Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridges Outreach Inc — 25% of income from government
- Choose New Jersey Inc — 25% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Rabbinical College of America — 5% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fairleigh Dickinson University — 2% of income from government
- Mental Health Association of Essex and Morris Inc — 1% of income from government
- Ym-Ywha of Union County — 1% of income from government
- Golda Och Academy — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Z S & M Wilf Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.