Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zotec Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$875kHuman Services$480kYouth Development$400kPhilanthropy$197kEducation$125kEmployment$100kHealth$34kCrime & Legal$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST TEE$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $500k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIRLS WHO CODE: $150k → 17%MONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $25k → 11%FOSTER SUCCESS INC: $115k → 16%FOSTER SUCCESS INC: $115k → 16%FOSTER SUCCESS: $50k → 16%MCCOY INC: $25k → 16%FOSTER SUCCESS: $10k → 16%FOSTER SUCCESS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
IN
PA
CA
DE
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 5 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +86% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
40

Total granted

$1.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+86%
+15%

Still filing today

60%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FOSTER SUCCESS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $300k · revenue +65%
  • DA
    DREAM ALIVE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $100k · revenue +86%
  • IS
    INDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $100k · revenue +308%

Funded once

  • GIRLS WHO CODE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +5%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +21%
  • PT
    PGA TOUR CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Foundation for Youth of Bartholomew County Inc

Our mission is to inspire and enable youth ensuring they have the resources and opportunities to grow, learn, and thrive.

Youth Development
4
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
5
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
6
Indiana Youth Institute Inc

Our mission is to improve the lives of all indiana children by strengthening and connecting the people, organizations, and communities focused on kids and youth.

Human Services
7
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
10
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
11
Indiana Wish Inc

The mission of indiana wish is to grant wishes to indiana children ages 3 -18 diagnosed with a life-threatening illness.

Health
12
University High School of Indiana Inc

To expand the hearts and minds of students and to nurture excelence through academic, creative, and physical achievement.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Who Code Inc; the most unlike its peers is Techhounds Boosters Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST TEE: $600,000 · OtherFIRST TEEINDY WOMEN IN TECH INC: $100,000 · OtherINDY WOMEN IN TECH INC+15 more: $146,000 · Other+15 moreFOSTER SUCCESS: $300,000 · Human ServicesFOSTER SUCCESSGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INCMARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $25,000 · Human ServicesASCENT 121 INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentPGA TOUR CHARITIES…DREAM ALIVE INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAM ALIVE INCSTARFISH INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTARFISH INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS…Saint Florian Center Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSaint Florian Cent…The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Hendricks Coun…Champions of Youth Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentChampions of Youth…PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATIO…FIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIGHT FOR LIFE FOU…AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $151,500 · PhilanthropyRIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyIndiana University Foundation: $100,000 · EducationElevate Indianapolis Inc: $25,000 · EducationCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $25,000 · EducationYOUTH LINK SOUTHERN INDIANA: $25,000 · EducationINDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION: $100,000 · Recreation & SportsHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsFREEWHEELIN COMMUNITY BIKES: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 · HealthSHALOM HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $4,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 · HealthHEART AND SOUL CLINIC INC: $2,000 · Health
Other$846,000Human Services$525,000Youth Development$375,000Philanthropy$181,500Education$175,000Recreation & Sports$150,000Health$51,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTER SUCCESS: $300,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $151,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPGA TOUR CHARITIES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDY WOMEN IN TECH INC: $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetDREAM ALIVE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetINDIANA SPORTS CORPORATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRIPLEY COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSTARFISH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSaint Florian Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetSOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCICP FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetElevate Indianapolis Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetRIGHTFIT INC: $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTEENWORKS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetChampions of Youth Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFIGHT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetFREEWHEELIN COMMUNITY BIKES: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetYOUTH LINK SOUTHERN INDIANA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetASCENT 121 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEART OF A LION: $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCarmel PorchFest Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetJUBILEE VILLAGE PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHALOM HEALTH CARE CENTER INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN46.7× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Pacers Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Arthur Dean Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zotec Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zotec Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zotec Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Zotec Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zotec’s filings →

    More from the funding graph