Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zore Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$418k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$783kEducation$410kHealth$164kArts & Culture$122kReligion$87kPublic Benefit$50kYouth Development$37kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $293k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$176k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY GREATER MILWAUKEE$113,000
ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL$60,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN$60,000
HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE I INC$60,000
THE SALESIANUM TRUST$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE$20,000
LOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGN$20,000
WAR MEMORIAL CENTER$20,000
NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPTIAL$10,000
BADGER INSTITUTE$10,000
AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA$4,000
NATIVITY JESUIT ACADEMY$3,000
NOTRE DAME SCHOOL OF MILWAUKEE$2,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $8k → 10%VOLUNTEER FL FOUNDATION: $10k → 19%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $20k → 5%HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%HERSHEL WOODY WILLIAMS MEDAL OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPTIAL: $10k → 10%AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS: $6k → 5%HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 12%NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPTIAL: $8k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $5k → 5%NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $8k → 10%AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS: $5k → 5%NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $8k → 10%NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $8k → 10%NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $8k → 10%NCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $8k → 10%ABCD AFTER BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS: $5k → 17%UWM FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UWM FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UWM FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%UWM FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%WAR MEMORIAL CENTER: $20k → 17%UWM FOUNDATION - CHANCELLOR'S STUDENT SUCCESS FUND: $20k → 17%THE SALESIANUM TRUST: $25k → 17%ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL: $60k → 17%ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 17%LOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGN: $20k → 17%LOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGN: $20k → 17%LOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGN: $20k → 17%ST THOMAS MORE: $10k → 17%ST THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP: $8k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP: $5k → 17%BADGER INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%BADGER INSTITUTE: $10k → 17%HISTORIC HAYMARKET MILWAUKEE I INC: $60k → 17%MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN: $60k → 17%UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND (UPAF): $7k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE AND WAUKESHA COUNTY: $164k → 17%UNITED WAY: $141k → 17%UNITED WAY: $141k → 17%UNITED WAY GREATER MILWAUKEE: $113k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $104k → 17%UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $100k → 17%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 23 repeat orgs$296k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -16% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-16%

Still filing today

65%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE UWM FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $200k · revenue +30%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $64k · revenue +22%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • UF
    UWM FOUNDATION - CHANCELLOR'S STUDENT SUCCESS FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • WW
    WOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -16%
  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
4
Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

Inspiring philanthropy, serving donors, strengthening communities, now and for future generations.

Philanthropy
5
My Choice Wisconsin Inc

We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.

Health
6
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
7
Wisconsin Medical Society Inc

To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.

—
8
Uwm Research Foundation Inc

Support research and innovation at the university of wisconsin - milwaukee by providing reserach funding, entrepreneurship support, and by engaging in corporate partnering activities to that end.

Community Improvement
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Forward Collective Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $282,000 · OtherUNITED WAYSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INC: $120,000 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE HIGH SCHOOL INCUNITED WAY GREATER MILWAUKEE: $113,000 · OtherUNITED WAY GREATER MILWAUKEELOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGN: $60,000 · OtherLOVE ONE ANOTHER ARCHDIOCESAN CAMPAIGNNCH CENTER FOR PHILANTHROPY: $37,500 · OtherTHE SALESIANUM TRUST: $25,000 · Other+11 more: $96,500 · Other+11 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $367,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILW…HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDAT…MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $21,500 · EducationMCPREPARATORY S…CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $8,000 · Education+1 more: $3,200 · EducationHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $60,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $63,717 · HealthNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $17,500 · HealthABCD INC: $16,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthBADGER INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $32,500 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $4,000 · Youth Development
Other$734,000Philanthropy$387,500Education$232,700Arts & Culture$115,000Health$104,717Public Benefit$50,000Youth Development$36,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $367,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $63,717 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Haymarket Milwaukee Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBADGER INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABCD INC: $16,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSAPHAT BASILICA FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Historic Haymarket Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds BADGER INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD YOUNG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ABCD INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY FORWARD COLLECTIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSAPHAT BASILICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE BALLET COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Cedar Street Charitable Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Charter Manufacturing Company Foundation Inc · Sensient Technologies Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zore Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zore Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Naples Community Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zore Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Zore Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zore Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph