Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zomma Group Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$25kPhilanthropy$12kHealth$10kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$5kReligion$1kEnvironment$500International$500
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS$13,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA$5,000
SEBASTIANSTRONG FOUNDATION INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of Zomma Group Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 89% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 60%.

Zomma Group Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$25k · 4 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +54% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
12

Total granted

$25k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+54%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22’23’24
HealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k
  • FC
    FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $4k · revenue +62%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT & ALUMNI RELATIONS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CITIZENS BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • TW
    THE WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

—
2
Unidad of Miami Beach Inc

Unidad is a community based organization that serves as a social service, educational and cultural affairs organization on behalf of the residents of Miami Beach in service of the welfare of the entire city, with a special emphasis on the…

Human Services
3
Institute for Child and Family Health Inc

The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.

—
4
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

—
5
Miami Beach Chamber of Commerce

The chamber is organized for the purpose of advancing the economic, professional, cultural, educational and civic welfare of miami beach and the area surrounding miami beach, florida. the chamber is committed to encouraging the growth of…

—
6
University of Miami
—
7
Florida Medical Association Inc

The florida medical association exists to help physicians practice medicine. their goals are public policy advocacy, practice viability, being the voice of medicine, increasing value to members, and optimizing effectiveness.

—
8
Miami-Dade Innovation Authority Inc

Miami-dade innovation authority bridges the gap between private innovators and the public sector to fast track innovation that improves quality of life for miamians.

Science & Tech
9
Florida Smacna Inc

Improving the construction business in florida

—
10
Miami-Dade Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of M-DCC is to create opportunities for economic and social transformation in our community. The vision of M-DCC envision a future where the diaspora of Black businesses thrive.

—
11
Heart of Florida United Way Inc

The mission of heart of florida united way is to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our communities. this is accomplished by standing up for the health, education, and financial stability of every person in central florida.

Philanthropy
12
Florida Health Care Education & Development Foundation Inc

The florida health care education and development foundation, inc. promotes the educational and professional growth of employees in fhca member centers to support staff stability and improved outcomes of resident care. its mission is to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Miami Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESSUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CITIZENS BOARD: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CITIZENS BOARDTHE WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION INC: $5,950 · OtherTHE WHEELCHAIR FOUNDATION INCFOSTER CARE REVIEW INC: $4,060 · OtherFOSTER CARE REVIEW INCUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT & ALUMNI RELATIONS: $2,550 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI DIVISION OF DEVELOPMENT & ALUMNI RELATIONS+6 more: $2,950 · Other+6 moreUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $11,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY MIAMI INCTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL O…SebastianStrong Foundation Inc: $2,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 · HealthICU Baby Inc: $250 · HealthREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $250 · Youth Development
Other$37,510Philanthropy$11,500Recreation & Sports$5,000Health$3,250Human Services$1,500Youth Development$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY MIAMI INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER CARE REVIEW INC: $4,060 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSebastianStrong Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICU Baby Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC ↗
  • Who funds SebastianStrong Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ICU Baby Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Miami IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Miami Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zomma Group Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zomma Group Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 33%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Foster Care Review Inc: 33% of income from government
  • United Way Miami Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Icu Baby Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zomma Group Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Zomma Group Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zomma Group’s filings →

More from the funding graph