Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$523k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$523k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$2.0MEducation$624kCrime & Legal$534kCivil Rights$239kArts & Culture$183kPublic Benefit$77kHuman Services$39kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$523,495
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS DONATIONS - STATEMENT ATTAC$523,495
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE BAHAMAS 65-0525850: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 39 repeat orgs$518k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 38 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
99

Total granted

$3.4M
$518k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+21%

Still filing today

33%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $550k · revenue +110%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $69k · revenue +39%
  • GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
    3× · 2018–2020 · $67k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • WC
    WORLD COALITION AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO 94-1156628
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • GC
    GLOBAL CONSERVATION FORCE 47-4499248
    one grant, 2019 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
2
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
5
California College of the Arts

California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…

Education
6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
8
Immigration Institute of the Bay Area

The immigration institute of the bay area helps immigrants, refugees, and their families join and contribute to the community.

Arts & Culture
9
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
10
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
11
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Community Services East Bay; the most unlike its peers is Russian River Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VARIOUS DONATIONS - STATEMENT ATTAC: $2,006,079 · OtherVARIOUS DONATIONS - STATEMENT ATTACWITNESS TO INNOCENCE 20-2394229: $133,600 · Other+114 more: $884,555 · Other+114 moreNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $550,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVE…PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $69,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF…+3 more: $26,000 · EducationGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $67,200 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $15,000 · Civil RightsELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $10,000 · Civil RightsThe Marsh A Breeding Ground For New Perf: $41,204 · Arts & CultureNorthern California Cultural Communications: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $2,945 · Arts & CultureLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION: $5,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more: $1,875 · Crime & LegalJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $15,000 · Health+3 more: $1,100 · HealthThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $3,500 · Public Benefit
Other$3,024,234Education$645,000Civil Rights$92,200Arts & Culture$56,149Crime & Legal$41,875Health$16,100Public Benefit$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $550,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $69,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $67,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Marsh A Breeding Ground For New Perf: $41,204 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCITY ARTS & LECTURES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER BURBANK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCultura y Arte Nativa De Las Americas: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLA RAZA COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStewards of the Coast and Redwoods: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetKQED INC: $1,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoodwise Community: $1,030 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR A NEW ECONOMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOffice of the Appellate Defender: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR JUSTICE & ACCOUNTABILITY: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Association of Bahamas Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRussian River Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER VALLEY WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADULT CONGENITAL HEART ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds The Marsh A Breeding Ground For New Perf ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY ARTS & LECTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES EAST BAY ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMONWEALTH CLUB - WORLD AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA24.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The Yelp Foundation · Firedoll Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP?

Find your warmest path to Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zitrin Foundation Co Bregante Company LLP’s filings →

More from the funding graph