· Private foundation
Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
62% of Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Donors Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $165k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k24 grants · $60k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TENUVAS SADIE | $60,000 |
| THE DONOR'S FUND | $35,000 |
| BELZ INSTITUTION IN ISRAEL | $10,000 |
| YESHIVA BETH MOSHE | $9,000 |
| LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL | $8,000 |
| BTY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| YESHIVA MEOR HATORAH | $4,000 |
| TALMUD TORAH DARCHEI AVOSEINU | $4,000 |
| YESHIVA KEREN ORAH - MATNAS MICHOEL FUND | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH OF CLIFFWOOD | $2,000 |
| YESHIVA DERECH HATORAH | $1,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TENUVAS SADIE2× · 2022–2023 · $96k · revenue +3%
- LCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC5× · 2021–2025 · $44k · revenue +14%
- TTTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- BSBAIS SHAINDELgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +202%
- YRYEMENITE RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2022 · $1k
- BOBonei Olam Incone grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
Operation of an educational institution for preschool and elementary school-aged children, providing both religous and secular education.
Religious School
Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…
Charity and education in u.s. and israel
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Support of religious schools in Israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Keren Orah and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Tenuvas Sadie. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 18 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TENUVAS SADIE ↗
- Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA OF KODSHIM ↗
- Who funds TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC ↗
- Who funds MESIVTA KEREN ORAH ↗
- Who funds OORAH INC ↗
- Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
- Who funds LAMDEINU INC ↗
- Who funds PEARL BLAU LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Yeshiva of Machzikai Hadas Inc ↗
- Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Lakewood Cheder School Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Meer Family Foundation · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mesivta Keren Orah — 10% of income from government
- Meiras Bais Yaakov Inc — 7% of income from government
- Oorah Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Zichron Bonim V'Bonos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.