Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$330k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.7MEducation$89kPhilanthropy$33kHuman Services$33kHealth$15kInternational$14kFood & Nutrition$12kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$2,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL BAIS YISROEL$75,500
CONGREGATION ZICHRON MENACHEM$46,800
YESHIVA NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC$45,000
CONG BAIS YAKOV YOSEF OSTROV$33,660
HEKDESH BEIT HACHAIM US INC$24,000
YESHIVAT HEATID$20,000
MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES 1000$14,437
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH OUTREACH$10,300
MESIVTA OF LONG BEACH$6,700
YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YESHIVA TORAS ARON$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
YESHIVA KATANA TORAS CHAIM$3,500
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A TIME: $1k → 20%A TIME: $1k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 71 repeat orgs$276k to everyone else

71 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
104

Total granted

$1.2M
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+39%

Still filing today

11%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +58%
  • YH
    YESHIVAT HEATID INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $42k · revenue +11%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR
    4× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • YT
    YESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CM
    CHAIM MAYER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
  • TS
    TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Yeshiva Ohr Torah

Promoting education by providing financial assistance and support services to educational organizations worldwide; to promote the jewish religion and jewish education through provision of educational programs, assisting the creation of…

Philanthropy
6
Hayashar Vehatov Inc

The furtherance of primacy of orthodox jewish jurisprudence

Religion
7
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
8
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
9
Ner Avraham Inc

To disseminate the torah and torah values by creating institutions catering to various age groups; to publish religious and educational books; to provide stipends to torah scholars.

Religion
10
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
11
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
12
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Chesed Shbchesed Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KHAL BAIS YAKOV YOSEF OSTROW: $97,219 · OtherKHAL BAIS YAKOV YOSEF OSTROWKOLLEL BAIS YISROEL INC: $81,500 · OtherKOLLEL BAIS YISROEL INCCONGREGATION ZICHRON MENACHEM INC: $77,300 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MENACHEM INCIndividual grant recipient: $59,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC: $54,000 · OtherYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH: $50,000 · OtherCONGREGATION KHAL MEKOR CHAIM: $46,300 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $40,003 · Other+161 more: $650,950 · Other+161 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH OUTREACH CORP: $75,960 · ReligionAMERICAN FRI…YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $70,750 · ReligionYESHIVAS NER…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $13,308 · ReligionAMERICAN FRI…+2 more: $1,300 · ReligionYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $44,800 · EducationYESHIVAT HEATID INC: $42,000 · Education+2 more: $400 · EducationPROJECT REFUAH INC: $25,000 · InternationalKOL HANEARIM INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $50 · InternationalTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $12,400 · Food & NutritionBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,180 · Human ServicesCHESED SHBCHESED INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC: $2,600 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INC: $1,400 · Philanthropy
Other$1,156,272Religion$161,318Education$87,200International$26,050Food & Nutrition$12,400Human Services$12,180Philanthropy$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH OUTREACH CORP: $75,960 over 5y, 24% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $70,750 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $44,800 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT HEATID INC: $42,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT REFUAH INC: $25,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $13,308 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $12,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECHO NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $2,480 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $1,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUARDIANS OF THE SICK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $376 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEFARIA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDAS TOV V'CHESED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EMUNAH OUTREACH CORP ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT HEATID INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT REFUAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAIM MAYER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY67.9× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Partners in Giving Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Zichron Simcha Dsassov · Reyim Ahuvim Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 187 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zichron Avroham Moshe’s filings →

More from the funding graph