Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zhu Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$373k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$100k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of Zhu Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Zhu Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $373k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
5
’18
4
’19
5
’20
6
’21
2
’22
4
’23
4
’24
3
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.5MScience & Tech$182kHealth$100kArts & Culture$2k
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $173k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HARKER SCHOOL$100,000
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic$100,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$40,000
CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION$30,000
CONCORD REVIEW$20,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$20,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC$12,500
U C SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION$10,000
THE HARKER SCHOOL$10,000
MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25k → 16%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $100k → 8%U C SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%UC REGENTS: $174k → 14%GATHERING 4 GARDNER INC: $8k → 11%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $30k → 6%MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25k → 16%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $23k → 8%U C SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%UC REGENTS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $20k → 6%MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $25k → 16%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $20k → 8%UC REGENTS: $75k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $20k → 6%MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 8%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $13k → 16%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $40k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 6%BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $13k → 16%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $10k → 8%UC REGENTS: $30k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $15k → 6%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $10k → 6%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic: $100k → 8%THE HARKER SCHOOL: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $10k → 6%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $4k → 6%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $25k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $13k → 14%CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $4k → 6%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $10k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic: $5k → 8%CONCORD REVIEW: $20k → 8%CONCORD REVIEW: $15k → 8%CONCORD REVIEW: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 9 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$4k

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Science & TechEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HARKER SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $181k · revenue +38%
  • CF
    Center for Excellence in Education
    8× · 2017–2025 · $128k · revenue +28%
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $100k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • AN
    ALUMNI NETWORK OF SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY NORTHERN
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • WA
    WE ARE TOGETHER SVYO INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge

The mission of the university of cambridge is to contribute to society through the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence. organizationally, we achieve this through two divisions…

—
10
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
11
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
12
Chancellor Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford

The principal objects of the University are the advancement of learning by teaching and research, and its dissemination by every means. We work as one Oxford bringing together our staff, students and alumni, our colleges, faculties,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is President and Fellows of Harvard College; the most unlike its peers is Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $792,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $775,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $181,148 · EducationTHE HARKER SCHOOL+1 more: $16,000 · EducationUC REGENTS: $378,750 · OtherUC REGENTSPRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Sternlic: $215,000 · OtherPRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $105,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA…The Concord Review Inc: $50,000 · OtherThe Concord Review Inc+2 more: $4,000 · OtherCenter for Excellence in Education: $128,000 · Science & TechGathering 4 Gardner Inc: $8,128 · Science & TechBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 · HealthMATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $45,000 · Youth Development
Education$1,764,148Other$752,750Science & Tech$136,128Health$100,000Youth Development$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $792,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $775,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARKER SCHOOL: $181,148 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education: $128,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Concord Review Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetMATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $45,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGathering 4 Gardner Inc: $8,128 over 1y, 4.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE HARKER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Center for Excellence in Education ↗
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Concord Review Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATHEMATICS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gathering 4 Gardner Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA12.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zhu Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zhu Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zhu Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph