Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$31kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$10kCommunity Improvement$10kYouth Development$7kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAFTON HIGH SCHOOL$2,500
OZAUKEE COUNTY ADULT LITERACY$1,000
MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM$1,000
MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM$1,000
NORTHERN GRACE YOUTH CAMP$1,000
COPE SERVICES$1,000
FAMILY SHARING$1,000
CELEBRATE GRAFTON$1,000
OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES$1,000
OZAUKEE NONPROFIT CENTER$500
GRAFTON AREA LIVE ARTS$500
GRAFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION$500
FRIEND OF USS LIBERTY LIBRARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 6%OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 17 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$107k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+26%

Still filing today

41%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    GRAFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +20%
  • OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +55%
  • MA
    MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • OZAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Waukesha County Historical Society & Museum Inc

The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.

—
2
Milwaukee County Historical Society Inc

The milwaukee county historical society was founded in 1935 to collect, preserve, and make available materials relating to the history of the milwaukee community.

Arts & Culture
3
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—
4
Markesan Historical Society
—
5
Manitowoc County Historical Society Inc

Historical education and preservation

Arts & Culture
6
Wisconsin Museum of Quilts & Fiber Arts Inc

The Museum, located just east of historic downtown Cedarburg, Wisconsin is dedicated to educating the public about the artistice, cultural, historic and social importance of quilts and fiber arts. We also seek to increase the awareness of…

Arts & Culture
7
Old World Wisconsin Foundation Inc

Enhance the well-being of old world wisconsin

—
8
Nonprofit Center of Milwaukee Inc

To promote interests and effectiveness of the nonprofit sector through strengthening organizational capacity, expanding volunteerism and encouraging collaboration.

—
9
German Christmas Market of Oconomow

Promote enhanced relationship w/Oconomowocs Sister City in Dietzenbach, Germany, celebrate the rich German heritage w/in the community, showcase Oconomowocs downtown, provide economic assistance to foster studen relations with Dietzenbach…

Arts & Culture
10
Cedarburg Cultural Center Inc

The mission of the Cedarburg Cultural Center is to provide a gathering place to celebrate community, the arts and local heritage.

Arts & Culture
11
Oconto County Economic Development Corporation

Stimulate development of the local economy, provide support to existing and prospective employers, serve as a professional resource to local units of government and promote tourism opportunities within oconto county wisconsin.

Community Improvement
12
Wisconsin Maritime Museum Inc

The wisconsin maritime museum connects all people with wisconsin's waterways, by engaging and educating the public about wisconsin's maritime history, wisconsin's world war ii submarines, uss cobia, and the great lakes. the wisconsin…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Public Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Celebrate Grafton Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COPE SERVICES INC: $12,000 · OtherCOPE SERVICES INCOZAUKEE COUNTY ADULT LITERACY: $8,000 · OtherOZAUKEE COUNTY ADULT LITERACYNORTHERN GRACE YOUTH CAMP INC: $8,000 · OtherNORTHERN GRACE YOUTH CAMP INCGRAFTON HIGH SCHOOL: $7,500 · OtherGRAFTON HIGH SCHOOLF4 FOUNDATION BURN CAMP: $5,000 · OtherF4 FOUNDATION BURN CAMPFAMILY SHARING: $4,000 · OtherFAMILY SHARINGGRAFTON AREA LIVE ARTS: $4,000 · OtherGRAFTON AREA LIVE ARTSFORE THE KIDS BURN CAMP: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $4,500 · Other+3 moreMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,600 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INCCELEBRATE GRAFTON INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureCELEBRATE GRAFTON INCMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INCOZAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Arts & CultureOZAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL S…GRAFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 · EducationGRAFTON EDUCAT…OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesOZAUKEE FAMI…OZAUKEE NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $1,500 · Community Improvement
Other$55,000Arts & Culture$26,600Education$14,000Human Services$12,000Community Improvement$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRAFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $14,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetOZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOPE SERVICES INC: $12,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetMILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC: $8,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCELEBRATE GRAFTON INC: $8,000 over 8y, 53% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN GRACE YOUTH CAMP INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetOZAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOZAUKEE NONPROFIT CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRAFTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COPE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CELEBRATE GRAFTON INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN GRACE YOUTH CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OZAUKEE NONPROFIT CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd?

    Find your warmest path to Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zaun Memorial Foundation Ltd’s filings →

    More from the funding graph