Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yuba River Endowment

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Food & Nutrition$530kHousing & Shelter$100kHealth$70kHuman Services$63kYouth Development$57kEducation$57kAnimals$44kReligion$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $67k
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wheatland School District$25,000
Yuba County Office of Education$12,000
Loma Rica Community Hall$10,000
Ella Elementary School$10,000
Yuba Sutter Economic Development Corp$10,000
First Presbyterian Church Food Pantry$7,500
California 4H Foundation$7,500
MJUSD Education Foundation$7,500
Foothill Food Pantry$6,000
Recce Town 5-6$2,500
Yuba Sutter Food Bank$1,000
Marysville High School$1,000
Friends for the Pres of Yuba History$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Yuba Sutter Veterans Stand Down: $35k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$463k · 10 repeat orgs$618k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +349% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
32

Total granted

$463k
$540k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+349%
-12%

Still filing today

10%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2022–2024 · $121k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $80k

Funded once

  • TC
    TWIN CITIES RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -45%
  • YC
    Yuba County Search & Rescue
    one grant, 2021 · $44k
  • TI
    TRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue -32% · 33% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Placer Yuba Butte Sutter District Council

To feed and clothe the needy

Human Services
2
Yavapai County Sheriffs Response T

Search and Rescue in Yavapai County, AZ

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Yuba City Police K9 Officers Assoc

The yuba city k9 officers association is set up to support the needs of active and retired law enforcement k9 officers. they provide the safety of the k9 officers while on duty and comfort in retirement.

Animals
4
Sutter Yuba Community Foundation

To encourage giving for the betterment of our community. to be the preferred avenue for donors, prpofessional advisors and others interested in enhancing philanthropy in sutter and yuba counties and surrounding communities.

Philanthropy
5
Yuba Sutter Regional Arts Council

Yuba sutter arts provides arts programming and advocacy for the bi-county yuba-sutter area. our mission is to enrich the quality of life of our residents through participation and effective arts development. we host exhibitions, workshops,…

Arts & Culture
6
Yuba Watershed Protection and Fire Safe Council

Yuba watershed protection and fire safe council facilitates collaboration throughout the yuba county foothills to proactively build watershed and community resilience to wildfire by educating and empowering residents, implementing…

Human Services
7
Yuba City High School Grad Night

To assist and organize parents and volunteers of the community to collaboratively plan a safe and sober grad night for yuba city high school and albert powell high school graduates.

Education
8
Yolo Food Bank

The mission of yolo food bank is to make yolo county a thriving community where everyone has the resources they need to experience health, prosperity, and a high quality of life. Yolo Food bank durably increases food and nutrition security…

Food & Nutrition
9
Yakima County Youth Fire Prevention

Community outreach

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Yuba Sutter Chamber of Commerce

The yuba sutter chamber of commerce supports local businesses as a partner by promoting economic growth and development opportunities that serve to enhance economic vitality.

Community Improvement
11
Yuma County Sheriffs Office League of Volunteers Inc

The mission of the Yuma County Sheriffs Office League of Volunteers (SOLV) is to assist and support the Yuma County Sheriffs Office with certain duties that promote the health and well-being of Yuma County residents. It is the purpose and…

Public Benefit
12
Sutter Buttes Social Club

The active 20-30 club of marysville/yuba city foundation provides community service to improve the quality of life for youth in the yuba sutter area.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trauma Intervention Program and the most unlike its peers is Recce Town 5-6. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
2/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $121,103 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYuba County Search & Rescue — $44,443 · OtherTRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $40,000 · Other13th District Ag Association — $35,392 · OtherYUBA COUNTY MOUNTED SHERIFFS POSSE — $35,000 · OtherMJUSD Education Foundation — $32,500 · Other+37 more — $442,691 · Other+37 moreYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc — $57,658 · Food & NutritionYUBA-SUTTER FAIR HERITAGE FOUNDATION IN — $10,000 · Food & NutritionTWIN CITIES RESCUE MISSION — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterYUBA SUTTER VETERANS STAND DOWN — $35,000 · Human ServicesYUBA SUTTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP — $10,000 · Community ImprovementTHE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION — $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$911,129Food & Nutrition$67,658Housing & Shelter$50,000Human Services$35,000Community Improvement$10,000Youth Development$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc — $57,658 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES RESCUE MISSION — $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $40,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetYUBA SUTTER VETERANS STAND DOWN — $35,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetYUBA COUNTY MOUNTED SHERIFFS POSSE — $35,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetAgency on AgingArea 4 — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYUBA SUTTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRecce Town 5-6 — $2,500 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Yuba Sutter Gleaners Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds TRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM
  • Who funds YUBA SUTTER VETERANS STAND DOWN
  • Who funds YUBA COUNTY MOUNTED SHERIFFS POSSE
  • Who funds Agency on AgingArea 4
  • Who funds YUBA SUTTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds YUBA-SUTTER FAIR HERITAGE FOUNDATION IN
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA 4-H FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yuba River Endowment funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yuba River Endowment?

    Find your warmest path to Yuba River Endowment through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph