Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ysk Family Religious Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2018
96
Grants FY2018
7
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
0154% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Religion$69kHealth$5kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$208Science & Tech$180Education$154Food & Nutrition$100Other$0
02FY2018 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k95 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$180
Median grant
7
States reached
$868k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,000
YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY$7,200
BAIS YAAKOV$7,200
YESHIVA NER TORAH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CONGREGATION DIVREI YOEL$2,250
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,980
CAMP AGUDAH$1,875
CHAI LIFLINE$1,850
Individual grant recipient$1,800
CHAI LIFELINE$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Kollel Zichron Shneur$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 86% of grant dollars ($126k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 14% that went abroad ($20k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $932) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A TIME: $360 → 20%COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $72 → 14%YEDAI CHESED: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
FL

Beyond the US: 14% of all-years giving ($20k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$19k · 4 grants
OC$2k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$49k · 11 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 73 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
53

Total granted

$49k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-53%
+56%

Still filing today

9%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YN
    YESHIVA NER TORAH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $17k
  • YO
    YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k
  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV OF RAMAPO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k

Funded once

  • AB
    ATERES BAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY OF ROCKLAND
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • MB
    MASORES BAIS YAAKOV
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
7
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
8
Yeshivat Ohel Torah

To conduct a school for Hebrew religious education

Religion
9
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
10
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
11
Yeshivas Ohr Yissochor Academy Inc

To operate a school in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
12
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel; the most unlike its peers is Lakewood Cheder School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA NER TORAH: $16,560 · OtherYESHIVA NER TORAHYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INC: $13,200 · OtherYESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY INCATERES BAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY OF ROCKLAND: $12,099 · OtherATERES BAIS YAAKOV ACADEMY OF ROCKLANDBAIS YAAKOV OF RAMAPO: $8,600 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV OF RAMAPOBAIS YAAKOV: $7,200 · OtherBAIS YAAKOV OF SPRING VALLEY: $6,467 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+111 more: $52,284 · Other+111 moreCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,650 · Health+1 more: $54 · HealthYEDEI CHESED INC: $500 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $360 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $72 · Human ServicesYESHIVA GEDOLA OHR HATORAH INC: $250 · EducationYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $136 · EducationMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $100 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $54 · EducationIMREI YOSEF: $300 · PhilanthropyGEMILAS CHESED INC: $136 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 · PhilanthropyKOLLEL IYUN HALACHA: $300 · ReligionAmreican Friends of Birkat Kohanim: $72 · ReligionKEREN BNEI TORAH: $18 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MEKOR CHAIM: $18 · ReligionEZER MIZION: $108 · InternationalSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Other$139,410Health$3,704Human Services$932Education$540Philanthropy$536Religion$408International$108Food & Nutrition$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $3,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEDEI CHESED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMREI YOSEF: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA OHR HATORAH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEMILAS CHESED INC: $136 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEZER MIZION: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMesivta Ahavas Hatorah: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmreican Friends of Birkat Kohanim: $72 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEKIMI: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds YEDEI CHESED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY34.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Bodner Family Foundation · Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · Kitov Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ysk Family Religious Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ysk Family Religious Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ysk Family Religious Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ysk Family Religious Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ysk Family Religious’ filings →

    More from the funding graph