· Private foundation
Yr Foundation Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k51 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $194k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $725k
- $250k+2 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEREN ZAM INC | $299,000 |
| YESHIVA MEOR ENAIM | $251,000 |
| BRESLOV INTERNATIONAL INC | $200,000 |
| ATERES ROSH KOLBESOV | $170,525 |
| RACHEM NA A DIVISION OF CHESED OF | $138,000 |
| YESHIVA OF SPRING VALLEY | $92,090 |
| Individual grant recipient | $74,300 |
| CONGREGATION RACHMASTRIVKA INC | $50,000 |
| YESHIVAS OHR V DAAS | $30,000 |
| KOLLEL ZICHRON MENACHEM | $29,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR | $27,000 |
| CONGREGATION SHAAREI TEFILLAH | $25,000 |
| YESHIVA EITZ CHAIM OF HILLSIDE INC | $15,000 |
| YESHIVA BIRCHAS HATORAH | $14,300 |
| AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA | $12,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.
79 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $207k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BMBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INC7× · 2019–2025 · $108k · revenue +12%
- YOYESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS7× · 2019–2025 · $108k · revenue +13%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC7× · 2019–2025 · $104k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- KTKHAL TEFILLAH LDOVIDone grant, 2024 · $50k
- CMCONG MEOR EINAYIMone grant, 2018 · $25k
- SESHAAR EPHRAIMone grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
How this is measured
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 212 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ohr Hakotel Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Kitov Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Fishoff Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Yr Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yr Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva of Greater Washington Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Yr Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to Yr Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Yr’s filings →