Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yow Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$62kHousing & Shelter$38kMembership Benefit$22kArts & Culture$18kEducation$15kYouth Development$12kFood & Nutrition$9kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Department of Children Services$12,116
Loaves and Fishes$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,091
CCC Ladies Golf Association$2,000
Burns$1,600
Department of Childrens Services$1,336
Individual grant recipient$1,300
Customs House Museum$1,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters$1,000
Middle TN Friends of Scouting$1,000
CMCSS Education Foundation$1,000
Clarksville Christian School$721
Veterans of Foreign Wars$600
Winters Angels$550
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Yaipak Outreach: $1k → 11%Operation Stand Down: $500 → 14%Yaipak Outreach: $600 → 11%Yaipak Outreach: $500 → 11%Yaipak Outreach: $500 → 11%Radical Missions: $500 → 11%Radical Missions: $250 → 11%YAI Paks Outreach: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CO
MO
KY
VA
AR
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 28 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +100% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
44

Total granted

$141k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+13%

Still filing today

29%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES OF CLARKSVILLE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +546%
  • CC
    CLARKSVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +242%
  • Y
    YAIPAK
    5× · 2018–2024 · $3k · revenue ×62

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of MOCO
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • A
    AGAPE
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Living Water Missions International

To operate exclusively for charitable purposes, specifically to relieve the poor, distressed, and underprivileged by providing free nutritious food, meals and essential resources to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or…

International
3
United Church of Christ Transition House

Provide a house which includes rent, electricity, water, phone and maintenance for women and children who are victims of domestic abuse

Human Services
4
Lexington Rescue Mission

The organization is a Christ-centered ministry that meets the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of hurting people in the greater Lexington area. Its activities are focused on rebuilding lives.

Human Services
5
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
6
Alpha Prison Ministries

To evangelize and disciple men who happen to be prisoners and former inmates

Religion
7
HEARTS4HEROES

Our focus is on at-risk men and women who served others through military service. Our mission is to meet each hero where they are in their walk with Christ, love them as Christ calls us to, provide basic needs for daily life and Biblical…

Religion
8
God Provides Ministry

To provide free food to homeless, veterans, and others

Food & Nutrition
9
Clarks Summit University

Clarks summit university is a fully accredited, christ-centered educational institution located in a suburban area of the scranton/wilkes-barre, pa metropolitan area. outstanding biblical higher education is offered through on-campus,…

Education
10
Korean Evangelical Church of Long Island Inc

We hold it to be the mission of the church to proclaim the gospel to all mankind, to exalt the worship of the one true god, and to labor for the progress of knowledge, the promotion of justice, the reign of peace, and the realization of…

Religion
11
Christian Cooperative Ministry Inc

To provide food and clothing for the residents in madison, tennessee and surrounding davidson county residents that are in need. we also provide sack lunches to the homeless in the area.

12
Powerhouse Ministries Inc

The mission of powerhouse ministries is to teach the gospel through speaking engagements and worship, personal ministry and help to the poor and needy.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Butterfly Moments Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Various Assistance to Indigent Fami — $32,424 · OtherVarious Assistance to Indigent FamiDepartment of Children Services — $26,661 · OtherDepartment of Children ServicesShelton Family Fund — $25,000 · OtherShelton Family FundIndividual grant recipient — $14,039 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $11,135 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+65 more — $67,975 · Other+65 moreLOAVES AND FISHES OF CLARKSVILLE — $8,250 · Food & NutritionCLARKSVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $4,021 · EducationMONTGOMERY COUNTY VETERANS COALITION — $2,150 · EducationFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationYAIPAK — $2,850 · Human ServicesRADICAL MISSION INC — $750 · Human ServicesOPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE — $500 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE — $1,758 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,250 · Youth DevelopmentDYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION OF THE PENNYRILE — $500 · HealthHOPE PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER — $500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $105 · HealthALZHEIMERS TENNESSEE INC — $100 · HealthBUTTERFLY MOMENTS INC — $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$177,234Food & Nutrition$8,250Education$7,371Human Services$4,100Youth Development$3,008Health$1,205Crime & Legal$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOAVES AND FISHES OF CLARKSVILLE — $8,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLARKSVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $4,021 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYAIPAK — $2,850 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY VETERANS COALITION — $2,150 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSVILLE POLICE UNION — $1,400 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity — $807 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetRADICAL MISSION INC — $750 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION OF THE PENNYRILE — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTERFLY MOMENTS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPower and Grace Preparatory Academy Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS TENNESSEE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES OF CLARKSVILLE
  • Who funds CLARKSVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds YAIPAK
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY VETERANS COALITION
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds CLARKSVILLE POLICE UNION
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds FREED-HARDEMAN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United FoundationMO17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · American Snuff Charitable Trust · Second Harvest Food Bank of Middle Tn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yow Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yow Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Yow Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph