Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Youredjian Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

International$389kHuman Services$212kPhilanthropy$203kArts & Culture$33kReligion$23kCivil Rights$20kPublic Benefit$20kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$56k
Total assets

Largely a single collection — about 93% of reported assets are Works Of Art.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CIVILITAS FOUNDATION$20,000
ARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
HOMENETMEN GLENDALE ARARAT$10,000
ARMENIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY$5,000
ARMENIAN MEDIA NETWORK$5,000
CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND$2,000
ARS FOUNDATION$2,000
AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSO: $10k → 8%FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL: $20k → 16%AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $2k → 14%PAROS FOUNDATION: $150k → 10%ST GREGORY ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURC: $500 → 10%SCSUN MEN'S VALLEYBALL: $3k → 14%ARMENIAN GENERAL BENEVOLENT UNION: $250 → 17%TOUMA FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 19%TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%ARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSO: $8k → 8%THE PAROS FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%CSUN FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND: $235k → 17%ARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSO: $5k → 8%ARPA FD FOR FILM MUSIC ASSN AFFMA: $6k → 14%CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND: $70k → 17%ARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSO: $500 → 8%AGBU MANOOGIAN-DEMIRDJIAN SCHOOL: $500 → 14%CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND: $25k → 17%ARMENIAN PATRIARIARCHATE OF JERUSAL: $20k → 14%CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND: $2k → 17%ST LEON CATHEDRAL PARISH: $1k → 14%ARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE CIVILITAS FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGO: $5k → 14%HOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394: $112k → 14%HOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394: $50k → 14%HOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394: $50k → 14%GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%ARS FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%UNITED WAY OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%SUMMIT VIEW SCHOOL: $1k → 14%ARMENIAN MEDIA NETWORK: $5k → 14%HOMENETMEN GLENDALE ARARAT: $10k → 14%ARMENIA ARTSAKH FUND: $10k → 14%ARMENIA ARTSAKH FUND: $8k → 14%ST PETER ARMENIAN CHURCH: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$742k · 6 repeat orgs$189k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
20

Total granted

$742k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-17%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF
    4× · 2017–2025 · $332k · revenue +248%
  • HA
    HOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394
    3× · 2017–2019 · $212k
  • TP
    THE PAROS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $155k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • TF
    TOUMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -71%
  • FE
    FAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • AP
    ARMENIAN PATRIARIARCHATE OF JERUSAL
    one grant, 2019 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Voice of the Armenian Church Inc
—
2
Armenian Wounded Heroes Fund Inc
International
3
Armenian Sports Hall of Fame
—
4
Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art Inc

To promote armenian contemporary experimental art

Arts & Culture
5
Amin Arasteh Foundation
—
6
Tufenkian Family Foundation
—
7
Global Arm Foundation

Education about armenia & caucasu region

Philanthropy
8
Armenian Professional Society Scholarship Fund

Further education

Arts & Culture
9
Armenian Film Society

Armenian film society celebrates armenian culture through year-round programming of film screenings, discussions, workshop, and lectures. it shines a spotlight on armenian films and filmmakers, as week as films that deal with armenian…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Armenian Home Inc
Human Services
11
Armanino Foundation
Philanthropy
12
The H Hovnanian Family Foundation Inc
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Armenian Media Network and the most unlike its peers is The Paros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF — $332,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF AR…ARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATI — $23,191 · InternationalARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATITHE CIVILITAS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · InternationalARMENIA ARTSAKH FUND INC — $17,500 · InternationalHOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394 — $212,000 · OtherHOMENETMEN ARARAT CHAPTER 1394TOUMA FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · OtherTOUMA FOUNDATION INCFAMILY EQUALITY COUNCIL — $20,000 · OtherFAMILY EQUALITY COUNCILARMENIAN PATRIARIARCHATE OF JERUSAL — $20,000 · OtherARMENIAN PATRIARIARCHATE OF JERUSAL+14 more — $39,550 · Other+14 moreTHE PAROS FOUNDATION — $154,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PAROS FOUNDATIONTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION I…UNITED WAY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC+2 more — $10,000 · Philanthropy+2 moreARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL FUND AIM FUND — $15,000 · HealthOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationARMENIAN MEDIA NETWORK — $5,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $1,500 · EducationSUMMIT VIEW SCHOOL — $1,000 · EducationHOMENETMEN GLENDALE ARARAT — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentARMENIAN EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
International$392,691Other$311,550Philanthropy$184,500Health$15,000Education$12,500Youth Development$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF — $332,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetTHE PAROS FOUNDATION — $154,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S ASSOCIATI — $23,191 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetTOUMA FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetARMENIA ARTSAKH FUND INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL FUND AIM FUND — $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGay Mens Chorus of Los Angeles — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT VIEW SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE IN ACTION INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGBU MANOOGIAN-DEMIRDJIAN SCHOOL — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vahik & Alice Pet…Bayramyan Family Foun…Mina & Hacob Shirvani…Jhm Charitable Founda…Sami & Annie Totah Fa…California Community …TF Educational Founda…The Armen and Gloria …John Mirak FoundationAfeyan Family Foundat…Ucla FoundationThe Bank of America C…
The Vahik & Alice Petrossian FoundationCA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vahik & Alice Petrossian Foundation · Bayramyan Family Foundation · Mina & Hacob Shirvanian Family Foundation Inc · Jhm Charitable Foundation · Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · TF Educational Foundation · The Armen and Gloria Hampar Family Foundation · John Mirak Foundation · Afeyan Family Foundation · Ucla Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Youredjian Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home