Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yosef Chaim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$114kEducation$46kHuman Services$7kScience & Tech$2kInternational$1kHealth$1kRecreation & Sports$1kYouth Development$457Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$127
Median grant
3
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,600
Hayim Shaal Congregation Inc$504
Jerusalem Centre for Research$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Ateret Aharon$300
Individual grant recipient$280
Individual grant recipient$200
Chasdei Yitzchok$180
Friends of Binyan Israel$180
American Friends of Ohr Hatalmud$127
American Friends of Bircas Chaim$101
Congregation Tiferes Yaakov$101
Bnei Torah Movement$101
American Friends of Michkane Meir$101
Shevet Achim Gam Yachad$101
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $189) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BEIT MEIR INC: $101 → 15%Misaskim: $26 → 20%Yad Shifra Inc: $26 → 20%Misaskim: $18 → 20%MAREH KEREN TORAH: $18 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 44 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
60

Total granted

$137k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+34%

Still filing today

11%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZH
    Zohar Hatorah Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +62%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM
    2× · 2017–2022 · $1k · revenue +43%
  • PL
    PEYLIM LEV LACHIM
    6× · 2018–2025 · $808 · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL TORAH
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • YK
    YAAKOV KOL TORAH CENTER INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • SE
    SHALOM EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
4
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
5
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
7
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
8
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
9
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
10
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
11
Ziv Israel Association
—
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Kupat Ha'ir; the most unlike its peers is Mesivta of North Jersey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

B'NEI BINYAMIN TORAH CENTER: $41,781 · OtherB'NEI BINYAMIN TORAH CENTERYESHIVA TORAH TEMIMAH: $18,040 · OtherYESHIVA TORAH TEMIMAHBET YAAKOV OROT SARA: $9,855 · OtherBET YAAKOV OROT SARATIFERES TORAH INSTITUTE: $8,330 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,800 · OtherOHEL YAAKOV INC: $6,812 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL TORAH: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · Other+92 more: $61,535 · Other+92 moreMESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $3,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $1,180 · Education+1 more: $36 · EducationZohar Hatorah Inc: $1,260 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $180 · ReligionAMERICAN FREINDS OF BIRCAS CHAIM: $101 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $101 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 · ReligionMACHON BETH MEIR: $401 · PhilanthropyBEIT MEIR INC: $101 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $44 · Human ServicesYAD SHIFRA INC: $26 · Human ServicesMAREH KEREN TORAH INC: $18 · Human ServicesBNAI ZION FOUNDATION INC: $52 · InternationalCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 · Health
Other$166,153Education$4,216Religion$1,742Philanthropy$401Human Services$189International$52Health$36

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZohar Hatorah Inc: $1,260 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $1,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $808 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMACHON BETH MEIR: $401 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEIT MEIR INC: $101 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNAI ZION FOUNDATION INC: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $44 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMasmid Govoha: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD SHIFRA INC: $26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESIVTA OF NORTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Zohar Hatorah Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM ↗
  • Who funds PEYLIM LEV LACHIM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY35.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jmg Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · The Madeb Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yosef Chaim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yosef Chaim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yosef Chaim’s filings →

    More from the funding graph