Skip to content
York Hospital at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

York Hospital

YORK HOSPITAL is a premier community teaching hospital providing quality, cost-effective health care services strongly supporting excellence in education, and offering essential services without regard for an individual's ability to pay.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$423MPublic Benefit$4.2MEducation$50kFood & Nutrition$7kCommunity Improvement$7kHuman Services$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $1,355,565, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,429,787 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $74,222 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$225,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF YORK$1,125,000
FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION$225,000
YORK HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,565
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FOUNDATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $14k → 8%YORK COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%PA Medical Society: $7k → 12%Spring Garden Township: $7k → 9%YWCA THE YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK: $5k → 9%CITY OF YORK: $1.1M → 9%CITY OF YORK: $1.0M → 9%CITY OF YORK: $1.0M → 9%FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $225k → 9%FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $125k → 9%FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $125k → 9%Family First Health: $125k → 9%Family First Health: $125k → 9%FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $94k → 9%WYNRIDGE FARM: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$427M · 5 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +180% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$427M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+180%
+2%

Still filing today

80%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    WELLSPAN MEDICAL GROUP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $228M · revenue +180%
  • WH
    WELLSPAN HEALTH
    5× · 2017–2021 · $194M · revenue +206%
  • FF
    FAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $819k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • YC
    YORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • TY
    THE YORK COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +14% · 36% of their budget
  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $14k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
York Hospital

York hospital is a premier community teaching hospital providing quality, cost-effective health care services strongly supporting excellence in education, and offering essential services without regard for an individual's ability to pay.

Health
2
Summit Physician Services

Summit physician services, and the associated wellspan medical group, operate on the belief that a large, well-organized group practice, based on primary and preventive care, and working collaboratively as part of an integrated health care…

—
3
Good Samaritan Physician Services

Good samaritan physician services' mission is improving the health of patients and our communities as a multi-specialty group, built on a foundation of primary care and prevention, and coordinated within a comprehensive system of care to…

Health
4
Vna Home Health Services

Vna home health services provides part-time, skilled, intermittent home health services that have been ordered by a physician and are medically necessary to the treatment of an illness or injury. vna home health services offers a wide…

—
5
Waynesboro Hospital

Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
6
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
7
Gettysburg Hospital

Gettysburg hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high quality health care services for the people who live, work, travel through, and vacation in adams county, pennsylvania and northern maryland.

Health
8
Wellspan Properties Inc

The purpose of wellspan properties is to develop medical centers and lease to tax-exempt affiliates.

Housing & Shelter
9
Wellspan Health Care Services

The purpose of wellspan health care services is to engage in health-related activities in the service area to benefit wellspan health and its affiliated health-related organizations.

Health
10
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon Pennsylvania

The good samaritan hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the overall health of the community.

Health
11
Chambersburg Health Services

Chambersburg health services is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to providing cancer treatment and developing and supporting medical centers for its wellspan tax-exempt affiliaties within franklin county, pennsylvania.

—
12
Wellspan Surgery & Rehabilitation Hospital

Wellspan surgery and rehabilitation hospital's mission is "supporting the journey to optimal health and independence by providing exceptional orthopedic, spine and acute rehabilitative care in a healing environment and coordinated through…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Young Women's Christian Association of York Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WELLSPAN MEDICAL GROUP: $227,774,063 · HealthWELLSPAN MEDICAL GROUPWELLSPAN HEALTH: $194,200,000 · HealthWELLSPAN HEALTH+4 more: $1,108,059 · HealthCITY OF YORK: $4,199,352 · Other+4 more: $25,708 · OtherYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 · Education
Health$423,082,122Other$4,225,060Education$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWELLSPAN MEDICAL GROUP: $227,774,063 over 8y, 12% of budgetWELLSPAN HEALTH: $194,200,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetFAMILY FIRST HEALTH CORPORATION: $818,750 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetYORK HEALTH FOUNDATION: $250,309 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetYORK COLLEGE OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YORK COUNTY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $14,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $5,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

York County Community…Amazonsmile Foundation
York County Community FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: York County Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization York Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from York Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on York Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home