Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yoon Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$342kInternational$67kEducation$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$8,185
Median grant
2
States reached
$353k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KEPC$29,754
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$8,185
OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY$4,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FROMTIER ECCLESIA MISSION: $3k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $5k → 10%SAN DIEGO STATE UNIV: $9k → 11%UC SANTA BARBARA: $4k → 14%UC DAVIS: $5k → 16%NYU: $5k → 17%UNIV OF HOUSTON: $5k → 16%GEORGIA TECH: $5k → 13%UNIV OF VIRGINIA: $3k → 8%TULANE UNIV: $5k → 23%SANTA CLARA POLICE OFFICERS ASSO: $1k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%NYU: $4k → 17%THE KING'S ACADEMY: $3k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%JUBILEE CITY CHURCH: $5k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%CHRISTIAN ASSEMBLY SOUTH BAY: $3k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%KEPC: $45k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%KEPC: $43k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%KEPC: $42k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%KEPC: $38k → 8%OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $4k → 10%KEPC: $30k → 8%KEPC: $30k → 8%KEPC: $28k → 8%KEPC: $22k → 8%ALMADEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHURCH: $2k → 8%KEPC: $19k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$406k · 4 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
14

Total granted

$406k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+42%

Still filing today

0%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • K
    KEPC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $297k
  • Compassion International Incorporated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +16%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k

Funded once

  • SD
    SAN DIEGO STATE UNIV
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • UD
    UC DAVIS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEPC: $296,530 · OtherKEPCOPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY: $33,400 · OtherOPEN DOOR MISSION SOCIETY+12 more: $52,784 · Other+12 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $67,047 · InternationalCompassion Inter…THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000 · EducationTHE KING'S ACADEMY: $3,000 · EducationFRONTIER ECCLESIA MISSION: $2,500 · Religion
Other$382,714International$67,047Education$8,000Religion$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $67,047 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KING'S ACADEMY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRONTIER ECCLESIA MISSION: $2,500 over 1y, 7.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER ECCLESIA MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yoon Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yoon Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yoon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph