Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yms Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2023
17
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

72% of Yms Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Friends Of Mosdot Goor, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 4 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Yms Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $70k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
0
’18
0
’19
0
’20
13
’21
19
’22
10
’23
4
’24
4
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.3MReligion$454kEducation$128kEnvironment$2kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k16 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG BETH MEDRASH MEOR YITZCHOK INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,600
Various$7,500
ICHUD MOSDOT GUR$6,600
Cong Bnai Shloma Zalman$5,550
MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY$5,000
THE OJC FUND$4,520
BNEI AVROHOM$4,000
YESHIVAS NOVOMINSK$3,600
CONGREGATION BAIS BERLINER$2,500
American Freinds of Shaarei Daas$2,300
KEDUSHAT ZION$2,000
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$1,800
ZICHRON AVROHOM$1,800
YESHIVA BETH YITZCHOK DSPINKA$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $500 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$460k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
57

Total granted

$1.4M
$395k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+42%

Still filing today

8%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DO
    DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
    4× · 2017–2020 · $1.2M
  • IM
    ICHUD MOSDOT GUR
    3× · 2021–2023 · $24k
  • BE
    Bais Esther School
    3× · 2021–2024 · $23k

Funded once

  • BY
    BOBOVER YESHIVAH BNEI ZION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • BZ
    BNOS ZION OF BOBOV INC
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • CT
    Cong Toldos Yakov Yosef
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Mesivta Keren Orah

To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.

Education
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Nezer Yisroel Inc
—
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva Nishmas Hatorah Inc

An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.

Religion
10
American Friends of Mosdos Keneses Yeshurun

American Friends of Mosdos Keneses Yeshurun Inc is the American charitable fundraising arm of Mosdos Keneses Yeshurun. Mosdos Keneses Yeshurun is an established Israeli institute that runs educational facilities and provides for the…

Philanthropy
11
Kolel Damsek Eliezer

To provide a facility for jewish scholars to study for the rabbinate and to assist in the support of these families.

Human Services
12
Keren Hayeshivot Trust

Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Mosdot Goor; the most unlike its peers is Cure and Healing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $1,209,005 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST+80 more: $590,690 · Other+80 moreFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $97,600 · EducationTHE OJC FUND: $40,120 · EducationMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $7,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $7,850 · ReligionKEREN REFUAH INC: $1,500 · Religion+1 more: $100 · ReligionCURE AND HEALING INC: $1,000 · HealthKOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $500 · Human Services
Other$1,799,695Education$145,220Religion$9,450Health$1,000Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR: $97,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE OJC FUND: $40,120 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION: $7,850 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN REFUAH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCURE AND HEALING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKOLLEL BAIS YISRAEL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOSDOT GOOR ↗
  • Who funds THE OJC FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVEH ZION ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS SANZ OF MONSEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY55.2× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · B&M Steinmetz Foundation · Birkas Rosh Foundation Inc · Cohen Ld Family Foundation Inc · Sdei Israel Foundation Inc · Friends of Mosdot Goor · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · S&W Foundation Inc · Zecher Avrohom Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Chavie Stern Family Foundation Inc · S&E Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yms Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yms Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yms Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Yms Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yms’ filings →

    More from the funding graph