Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
120
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$362kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$12kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$1kPublic Benefit$600Education$395International$338Other$0
02FY2024 · 120 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$125
Median grant
5
States reached
$50k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG MACHNE SHALVA$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,290
Individual grant recipient$2,274
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,400
Individual grant recipient$1,025
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SUPPORTERS OF TORAH$880
Individual grant recipient$700
Individual grant recipient$500
CONG GMC$500
V'YAZREIM$500
A TIME$500
KEREN CHASANIM$460
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCES: $180 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCES: $180 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCES: $100 → 14%ACHIEZER: $100 → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $10 → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $5 → 11%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $100 → 20%PROJECT LEND A HAND: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $560 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $460 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $452 → 20%A TIME: $430 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $410 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $350 → 20%MISASKIM: $300 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $280 → 20%BOBBIE'S PLACE: $200 → 20%MISASKIM: $200 → 20%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $170 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $165 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $150 → 20%KEREN ANIYIM: $138 → 20%A TIME: $136 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $120 → 20%SIMCHAS SARAH: $120 → 20%SIMCHAS SARAH: $120 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $110 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $101 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $100 → 20%YAD SHIFRA: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $100 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%MISASKIM: $100 → 20%A TIME: $100 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $50 → 20%MATAN B'SETER BAMBI: $50 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $50 → 20%KIMPATORIN AID: $36 → 20%MISASKIM: $280 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$258k · 177 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

177 repeat relationships: 70 still active in FY2024, 107 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

177
236

Total granted

$258k
$129k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-3%

Still filing today

15%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +346%
  • MC
    MISASKIM CORP
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +34%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +224%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • KH
    KEREN HACHESED
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
2
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
3
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
4
Nefesh Chaim Inc
Religion
5
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
8
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
12
Smach Zevilin of Ny Inc

To provide financial aid and assistance to the poor, sick & disabled people, and monetary support to needy families in time of need.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaim Medical Resource Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Center of Ulyanovsk Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 464 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/55
Grantees still filing
32/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATH: $28,035 · OtherYESHIVATH TORAH VODAATHKEREN HACHESED: $25,050 · OtherKEREN HACHESEDCONGREGATION MACHNA SHALVA: $22,320 · OtherCONGREGATION MACHNA SHALVAIndividual grant recipient: $20,505 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+173 more: $222,650 · Other+173 moreA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,846 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $1,640 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,613 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC: $961 · Human ServicesCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $630 · Human ServicesBOBBIES PLACE INC: $300 · Human Services+1 more: $240 · Human ServicesCLIFTON CHEDER INC: $5,100 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $245 · EducationEMET OUTREACH: $240 · EducationJEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC: $1,360 · ReligionOHR NAAVA: $434 · ReligionPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $422 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $270 · ReligionZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $250 · ReligionMASBIA: $1,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $470 · Food & NutritionKEREN KIRYAT SEFER INC: $520 · PhilanthropyTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $420 · PhilanthropyKEREN ACHVA: $360 · PhilanthropyCHAI LIFELINE INC: $636 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $636 · Health
Other$348,560Human Services$8,230Education$5,585Religion$2,736Food & Nutrition$1,470Philanthropy$1,300Health$1,272

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLIFTON CHEDER INC: $5,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $2,846 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $1,640 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,613 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH CENTER OF ULYANOVSK INC: $1,360 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMASBIA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC: $961 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $911 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $636 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM INC: $636 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN KIRYAT SEFER INC: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $470 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHR NAAVA: $434 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT INSPIRE INC: $422 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $420 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIVKAH LAUFER BIKUR CHOLIM: $370 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN ACHVA: $360 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOBBIES PLACE INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $285 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $270 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetZICHRON ELIYAHU INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $245 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMCHAS SARAH INC: $240 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEMET OUTREACH: $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLIFTON CHEDER INC ↗
  • Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
  • Who funds THE NEXT STEP INC ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIM CORP ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY65.9× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Reich Family Charitable Trust · Jsw Foundation · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The R & S Family Foundation Inc · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yisroel Aryeh and Leib Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 464 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yisroel Aryeh and Leib’s filings →

More from the funding graph