Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Yetta & Abraham Lester Family Fdn Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$202k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$201k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Education$205kReligion$46kHealth$12kPhilanthropy$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kHuman Services$2kInternational$1kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $201k
$200,787
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE$200,787
RIVERDALE TEMPLE$1,072
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOROT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$275k · 27 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
15

Total granted

$275k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+32%

Still filing today

59%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE
    2× · 2019–2022 · $201k · revenue +11%
  • EH
    EAGLEVILLE HOSPITAL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LE
    LCV EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • DI
    DOROT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +44%
  • GREENPEACE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
6
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

9
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
10
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
11
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ulster County Spca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Animal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Cancer Support OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 54 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%8%20–35yr14%39%35–55yr14%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%0%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr14%96%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,330

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
24/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE — $200,987 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE+1 more — $1,050 · EducationRIVERDALE TEMPLE — $46,462 · OtherRIVERDALE TEMPLEIndividual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…LCV EDUCATION FUND — $3,000 · Other+21 more — $9,425 · Other+21 moreEAGLEVILLE HOSPITAL — $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,450 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $600 · HealthADA Foundation — $500 · Health+2 more — $475 · HealthUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,600 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $1,000 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 · Human ServicesDOROT INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $500 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $300 · InternationalHIAS INC — $275 · InternationalGREENPEACE FUND INC — $1,000 · Environment
Education$202,037Other$62,387Health$10,525Philanthropy$4,600Human Services$3,000International$1,975Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE — $200,987 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEAGLEVILLE HOSPITAL — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADA Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $275 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetULSTER COUNTY SPCA — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yetta & Abraham Lester Family Fdn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 88%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph