Skip to content
Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc

To provide elementary school education in a religious setting.

$702k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$248k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.3MReligion$2.0MFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $428,155, the rows itemized in this filing. The $701,692 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $273,537 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $248k
$23,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA$248,310
CHASDEI LEV$37,975
BAIS SHAINDEL$37,945
OD YOSEF CHAI$29,450
KEREN ORAH$23,000
YESHIVA BAIS HATORAH$15,000
ZICHRON DANIEL MORDECHAI$13,300
YESHIVA TORAS ARON$12,125
CONGREGATION TIFERETH ISRAEL$11,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OD YOSEF CHAI: $31k → 14%BNEI AVROHOM: $24k → 20%TORAH INSTITUTE OF LAKEWOOF: $517k → 11%OD YOSEF CHAI: $30k → 14%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $248k → 11%OD YOSEF CHAI: $29k → 14%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $237k → 11%OD YOSEF CHAI: $23k → 14%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $190k → 11%CHASDEI LEV: $38k → 20%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $177k → 11%CHASDEI LEV: $34k → 20%BAIS SHAINDEL: $165k → 11%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $148k → 11%CONG ATERES YISROEL: $130k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $125k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $119k → 11%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $115k → 11%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $106k → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $87k → 11%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $81k → 11%BAIS SHAINDEL: $75k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $68k → 11%RABBINICAL SEMINARY OF HAMILTON: $60k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $55k → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $55k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $53k → 11%KEREN ORAH: $50k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $50k → 11%MESIVTA OHR YISROEL: $45k → 11%CONG NACHUM MORDECHAI: $45k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $42k → 11%YESHIVA BAIS HATORAH: $39k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $39k → 11%YESHIVA BAIS HATORAH: $39k → 11%BAIS SHAINDEL: $38k → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $37k → 11%BRR ENDOWMENT FUND: $35k → 11%KEREN ORAH: $32k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $31k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $31k → 11%BNOS DEVORA: $29k → 11%MASORAS BNOS YISROEL: $25k → 11%CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $25k → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $23k → 11%KEREN ORAH: $23k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL: $21k → 11%MASORAS BNOS YISROEL: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 18 repeat orgs$477k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
27

Total granted

$3.8M
$452k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $750k · revenue +82%
  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $496k · revenue +58%
  • BS
    BAIS SHAINDEL
    7× · 2018–2024 · $327k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • CA
    CONGREGATION ATERES YISROEL
    one grant, 2019 · $130k
  • CN
    CONGREGATION NACHUM MORDECHAI
    one grant, 2018 · $45k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc

Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
4
Bais Reuven Kamenetz of Lakewood

Educational. operation of a parochial elementary school, which provides religious and secular education to school-age children.

Education
5
Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
6
Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc

Educational-operation of private girls' elementary school.

Education
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
8
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
9
Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc

Yeshiva tiferes torah, inc. is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood, nj.

—
10
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
11
Bais Yaakov of Jackson Inc

Parochial high school

Education
12
Yotzer Ohr Lakewood a Nj Nonprofit Dba Bnos Miriam

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYA: $713,352 · OtherCONG ZICHRON YAAKOV YESHAYATORAH INSTITUTE OF LAKEWOOD INC: $610,230 · OtherTORAH INSTITUTE OF LAKEWOOD INCBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $251,303 · OtherBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INCCONGREGATION ATERES YISROEL: $130,000 · OtherCONGREGATION ATERES YISROELOD YOSEF CHAI INC: $113,034 · OtherYESHIVA KEREN ORAH: $104,500 · Other+26 more: $512,749 · Other+26 moreMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $749,673 · EducationMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INCYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $496,090 · EducationYESHIVA TORAS ARON INCBAIS SHAINDEL: $326,770 · EducationBAIS SHAINDELLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $155,582 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC+7 more: $98,800 · Education+7 moreYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $7,000 · ReligionAGUDAH CAMPS INC: $6,044 · ReligionTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $7,450 · Food & NutritionHADAR BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,435,168Education$1,826,915Religion$13,044Food & Nutrition$7,450Philanthropy$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC: $749,673 over 6y, 16% of budgetTORAH INSTITUTE OF LAKEWOOD INC: $610,230 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $496,090 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetBAIS SHAINDEL: $326,770 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $155,582 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMASORES BNOS YISROEL INC: $45,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetOHR AVROHOM CHAIM INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS: $10,738 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $9,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMosdos Yaakov Vyisroel: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC: $7,450 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $6,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $6,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDAH CAMPS INC: $6,044 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHADAR BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAS OHR HATORAH INC: $5,350 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESIVTA OHR YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds TORAH INSTITUTE OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS SHAINDEL ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MASORES BNOS YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds OHR AVROHOM CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS ↗
  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds Mosdos Yaakov Vyisroel ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS D'LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJewish Communal FundNational Society for …Jewish Community Foun…Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Toras Chesed IncTidewater Jewish Foun…Tifferet Moshe IncDirshu International …David Rosenbaum Famil…Lakewood Cheder Schoo…
The Ojc FundNY49.1× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Tifferet Moshe Inc · Dirshu International Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Lakewood Cheder School Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Mesivta Ohr Yisroel Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Gedolah Keren Hatorah Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc?

Find your warmest path to Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home