Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$4.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$6.2MEducation$2.1MFood & Nutrition$200kCivil Rights$150kInternational$130kArts & Culture$65kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.5M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GADEN PHODRAMG FOUNDATION OF THE DALAI LAMA$4,500,000
PALPUNG MUNISHASAN DHARMCHAKRA SANGH$100,000
THE TIBET CENTER INC$70,000
RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC$50,000
MAITRIPA COLLEGE$40,000
THE RATO DRATSANG FOUNDATION$30,000
LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 41% of grant dollars ($3.7M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 59% that went abroad ($5.4M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $20k → 8%STUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC: $30k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $100k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION (FPMT): $128k → 12%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 14%LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $20k → 8%STUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC: $20k → 17%INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $30k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION (FPMT): $120k → 12%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 14%LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $20k → 8%STUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC: $15k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION (FPMT): $120k → 12%LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $10k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION (FPMT): $120k → 12%LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $10k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION (FPMT): $110k → 12%RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $50k → 8%MAITRIPA COLLEGE: $40k → 12%RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $30k → 8%RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $30k → 8%RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $20k → 8%RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 59% of all-years giving ($5.4M)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Switzerland$4.5M · 1 grant
India$900k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 9 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
3

Total granted

$3.9M
$700k

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +54%
  • TT
    THE TIBET CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $460k · revenue +17% · 51% of their budget
  • RA
    RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DALAI LAMA TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Buddhist Education Foundation
Education
2
The Treasury of Lives Inc

The Treasury of Lives is biographical encyclopedia of Tibet, Inner Asia and Himalayan Region. The Treasury provides an accessible and well-researched biography of a wide range of figures, from Buddhist masters to artists and political…

—
3
The Institute of Buddha Dhamma Studies a Non Profit Corporation
Philanthropy
4
Tibet Justice Center

Defending civil and human rights secured by law

International
5
The Dharma Sanctuary
Religion
6
Dharma Refuge Inc

Buddhist Meditation and Study

Religion
7
Yunguang Chan Center

Religious culture and education, meditation and religions comparative study

Education
8
Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy

The purpose is to protect and promote human rights of Tibetan people.

Religion
9
Jsw Bhutan Legal Education Foundation Inc C/O White & Case Llp
Education
10
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
11
Nyingma Institute

The nyingma institute was founded in 1972 by tibetan teacher and author tarthang tulku to present the teachings of the tibetan tradition to the west. (see schedule o for full statement)

Religion
12
International Tibet Network

To maximize the effectiveness of the worldwide tibet movement, which is dedicated to ending human rights violations in tibet, and to actively supporting the tibetan people's right under international law to determine their own political,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Campaign for Tibet; the most unlike its peers is The Rato Dratsang Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GADEN PHODRAMG FOUNDATION OF THE DALAI LAMA: $4,500,000 · OtherGADEN PHODRAMG FOUNDATION OF THE DALAI LAMAFOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION INC: $598,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE MAHAYANA TRADITION INCTHE DALAI LAMA TRUST: $500,000 · OtherTHE DALAI LAMA TRUSTTHE TIBET CENTER INC: $460,000 · OtherTHE TIBET CENTER INC+4 more: $580,000 · Other+4 moreEmory University: $2,000,000 · EducationEmory University+1 more: $40,000 · EducationRIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $150,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $130,000 · InternationalLAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $80,000 · ReligionSTUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC: $65,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$6,638,000Education$2,040,000International$280,000Religion$80,000Arts & Culture$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $2,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TIBET CENTER INC: $460,000 over 6y, 51% of budgetTHE RATO DRATSANG FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 6y, 58% of budgetRIGHTS ACTION LAB INC: $150,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $130,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC: $80,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC: $65,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetMAITRIPA COLLEGE: $40,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds THE TIBET CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RATO DRATSANG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIGHTS ACTION LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET ↗
  • Who funds LAMA YESHE WISDOM ARCHIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR A FREE TIBET INC ↗
  • Who funds MAITRIPA COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gere FoundationCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gere Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company)?

    Find your warmest path to Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yeshe Khorlo Foundation (In Care of Aragon Trust Company)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph